Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17668214›Full record

ArticleDer Pathologe2007

[Fine-needle aspiration cytology. Aspects of a minimally invasive diagnostic procedure].

P Spieler, M Ammann, R Schönegg

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Pathologe, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

P SpielerAbteilung für Zytodiagnostik, Institut für Pathologie, Kantonsspital, 9007, St. Gallen, Schweiz. peter.spieler@kssg.ch
M Ammann
R Schönegg

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All practicable applications of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) for palpable tumors or non-palpable lesions guided with endoscopic and imaging procedures are presented. Multidisciplinary procedures and the technical and biological aspects of FNAC are presented. Indications and diagnostic challenges of FNAC on selected organs and neoplasms are discussed based on personal experience and the literature. Skilled and well-trained cytopathologists, the quality of the aspirate and the cytological preparation as well as supplementary immunocytochemical and molecular genetic analyses are mandatory for reliable diagnostic results. The indications and advantages of liquid-based techniques are discussed.

Indexed as

Biopsy, Fine-NeedleCytological TechniquesHumansMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.