ArticleIntensive care medicine2007
Can we apply the European surveillance program of nosocomial infections (HELICS) to pediatric intensive care units?
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Healthcare-associated infection prevention in pediatric intensive care units: a review.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the applicability of the HELICS program [part of the "Improving Patient Safety in Europe" program aiming at controlling nosocomial infections (NI) through surveillance] in European pediatric ICUs. DESIGN AND
settingA comparison of HELICS and pediatric definitions of the main NI was performed. The adaptability of the HELICS questionnaire for pediatric patients was examined. Then a European survey was carried out by e-mail questionnaire to analyze NI surveillance programs.
participantsUnits affiliated with the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care or the French Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et Urgences Pédiatriques. MEASUREMENTS AND
resultsThe main differences between adult and pediatric ICUs were the definition of ICU-acquired pneumonia, severity scores at admission, and scores of risk for NI. A total of 65 answers from 23 countries were collected. Among them 56 had a NI surveillance program that was of local origin for 64%. The most frequently collected NI were blood stream infections (91% of the units), catheter-related infections (88%), acquired pneumonia (86%), and urinary tract infections (77%). Definitions of NI had a local-based origin in 18% of cases, a regional-based or nation-wide origin in 21%, came from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 38% and had multiple origins in 20%. Seventy-five percent of the units declared an interest in joining a European pediatric working group on NI within the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care.
conclusionsThe adaptation of the HELICS protocol for pediatric ICUs is necessary. Its application is largely wished and may be easily performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.