Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17668043›Full record

ArticlePloS one2007

Validation of the SCID-hu Thy/Liv mouse model with four classes of licensed antiretrovirals.

Cheryl A Stoddart, Cheryl A Bales, Jennifer C Bare, George Chkhenkeli, Sofiya A Galkina, April N Kinkade, Mary E Moreno, José M Rivera, Rollie E Ronquillo, Barbara Sloan and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Antiretroviral Drug Metabolism in Humanized PXR-CAR-CYP3A-NOG Mice.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2018
    Article
  8. From in silico hit to long-acting late-stage preclinical candidate to combat HIV-1 infection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. HIV-1 immunopathogenesis in humanized mouse models.Cellular & molecular immunology · 2012
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cheryl A StoddartGladstone Institute of Virology and Immunology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America. cheryl.stoddart@ucsf.edu
Cheryl A Bales
Jennifer C Bare
George Chkhenkeli
Sofiya A Galkina
April N Kinkade
Mary E Moreno
José M Rivera
Rollie E Ronquillo
Barbara Sloan
Paul L Black
Gladstone Institutes · USTarget (United States) · US

Funding

TISSUE-BASED SMALL ANIMAL MODEL FOR HIV DRUG DISCOVERYN01AI005418 · NIAID · J. DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES · PI STODDART, CHERYL · 2000 to 2000
$971k
NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI005418NIAID NIH HHS N01-AI-05418.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe SCID-hu Thy/Liv mouse model of HIV-1 infection is a useful platform for the preclinical evaluation of antiviral efficacy in vivo. We performed this study to validate the model with representatives of all four classes of licensed antiretrovirals. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsEndpoint analyses for quantification of Thy/Liv implant viral load included ELISA for cell-associated p24, branched DNA assay for HIV-1 RNA, and detection of infected thymocytes by intracellular staining for Gag-p24. Antiviral protection from HIV-1-mediated thymocyte depletion was assessed by multicolor flow cytometric analysis of thymocyte subpopulations based on surface expression of CD3, CD4, and CD8. These mice can be productively infected with molecular clones of HIV-1 (e.g., the X4 clone NL4-3) as well as with primary R5 and R5X4 isolates. To determine whether results in this model are concordant with those found in humans, we performed direct comparisons of two drugs in the same class, each of which has known potency and dosing levels in humans. Here we show that second-generation antiretrovirals were, as expected, more potent than their first-generation predecessors: emtricitabine was more potent than lamivudine, efavirenz was more potent than nevirapine, and atazanavir was more potent than indinavir. After interspecies pharmacodynamic scaling, the dose ranges found to inhibit viral replication in the SCID-hu Thy/Liv mouse were similar to those used in humans. Moreover, HIV-1 replication in these mice was genetically stable; treatment of the mice with lamivudine did not result in the M184V substitution in reverse transcriptase, and the multidrug-resistant NY index case HIV-1 retained its drug-resistance substitutions.

conclusionGiven the fidelity of such comparisons, we conclude that this highly reproducible mouse model is likely to predict clinical antiviral efficacy in humans.

Indexed as

Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAnimalsAnti-HIV AgentsAnti-Retroviral AgentsDisease Models, AnimalDNA, ViralHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansMiceMice, SCIDRNA, ViralSevere Combined ImmunodeficiencyViral LoadVirus ReplicationAnti-HIV AgentsAnti-Retroviral AgentsDNA, ViralHistocompatibility Antigens Class IRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID17668043
PMCPMC1925140
OpenAlexW2056413661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.