Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17665183›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2007

Tenofovir comedication does not impair the steady-state pharmacokinetics of ritonavir-boosted atazanavir in HIV-1-infected adults.

Nils von Hentig, Brenda Dauer, Annette Haberl, Stefan Klauke, Thomas Lutz, Schlomo Staszewski, Sebastian Harder

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effect of drug interactions involving antiretroviral drugs on viral load in HIV population.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Factors influencing lopinavir and atazanavir plasma concentration.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2010
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Atazanavir: its role in HIV treatment.Expert review of anti-infective therapy · 2008
    Review
  14. Article
  15. What is the true risk of a pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction?European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nils von HentigPharmazentrum Frankfurt/ZAFES, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Hentig@em.uni-frankfurt.de
Brenda Dauer
Annette Haberl
Stefan Klauke
Thomas Lutz
Schlomo Staszewski
Sebastian Harder
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversity Hospital Frankfurt · DECardiovascular Center Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur objective was to evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics of ritonavir-boosted atazanavir when coadministered with tenofovir in HIV-1-infected adult patients.

designForty adult HIV-1-infected patients received either atazanavir/ritonavir 300/100 mg once daily and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors with (n = 20) or without (n = 20) tenofovir-disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir-DF) 300 mg once daily. Twenty-four-hour pharmacokinetics were assessed after at least 2 weeks of therapy according to a standardised therapeutic drug monitoring protocol.

methodsAtazanavir/ritonavir plasma concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, and the geometric means of minimum and maximum concentrations (C(min), C(max)), the area under the time-concentration curve (AUC), half-life (t(1/2)) and total clearance (CL(tot)) were subject to a matched pairs-analysis. Patients' pairs were matched for gender, ethnicity, weight and Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) status.

resultsThe respective geometric means (90% CI) for atazanavir C(min), C(max) and AUC with tenfovir vs. without tenofovir were 405 (314-523) vs. 417 (304-572) ng/ml, 3,022 (2,493-3,664) vs. 2,817 (2,341-3,390) ng/ml and 34,822 (29,315-41,363) vs. 32,101 (26,206-39,321) ng x h/ml showing no significant differences between the groups. Atazanavir plasma concentrations measured at week 5 of therapy or later were lower than in the first 4 weeks (T-test for C(max), p = .080; AUC, p = .050 and CL(tot), p = .051).

conclusionsThe coadministration of tenofovir-DF did not impair the plasma concentrations of ritonavir-boosted atazanavir in a pharmacokinetic analysis of patient pairs matched for gender, ethnicity, weight and CDC status.

Indexed as

HIV-1AdenineAdultAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveArea Under CurveAtazanavir SulfateChromatography, LiquidDrug CombinationsDrug InteractionsDrug MonitoringFemaleHalf-LifeHIV InfectionsHIV Protease InhibitorsHumansMaleAdenineAtazanavir SulfateDrug CombinationsHIV Protease InhibitorsOligopeptidesOrganophosphonatesPyridinesReverse Transcriptase InhibitorsRitonavirTenofovir

Identifiers

PMID17665183
OpenAlexW2095575152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.