Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17662114›Full record

Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2007

Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring in women with pregnancy induced hypertension or mild preeclampsia at term: the HYPITAT trial.

Corine M Koopmans, Denise Bijlenga, Jan G Aarnoudse, Erik van Beek, Dick J Bekedam, Paul P van den Berg, Jan M Burggraaff, Erwin Birnie, Kitty W M Bloemenkamp, Addi P Drogtrop and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Hospitalized late preterm mild preeclamptic patients with mature lung testing: what are the risks of delivery?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.

Corine M KoopmansDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, The Netherlands. c.m.koopmans@og.umcg.nl
Denise Bijlenga
Jan G Aarnoudse
Erik van Beek
Dick J Bekedam
Paul P van den Berg
Jan M Burggraaff
Erwin Birnie
Kitty W M Bloemenkamp
Addi P Drogtrop
Arie Franx
Christianne J M de Groot
Anjoke J M Huisjes
Anneke Kwee
Saskia le Cessie
Aren J van Loon
Ben W J Mol
Joris A M van der Post
Frans J M E Roumen
Hubertina C J Scheepers
Marc E A Spaanderman
Rob H Stigter
Christine Willekes
Maria G van Pampus
University Medical Center Groningen · NLAcademic Medical Center · NLElisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NLLeiden University · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLAtrium Medisch Centrum Parkstad · NLDeventer Ziekenhuis · NLGelre Hospitals · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLMartini Ziekenhuis · NLMedisch Centrum Haaglanden · NLOLVG · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLTreant Zorggroep · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertensive disorders, i.e. pregnancy induced hypertension and preeclampsia, complicate 10 to 15% of all pregnancies at term and are a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. The only causal treatment is delivery. In case of preterm pregnancies conservative management is advocated if the risks for mother and child remain acceptable. In contrast, there is no consensus on how to manage mild hypertensive disease in pregnancies at term. Induction of labour might prevent maternal and neonatal complications at the expense of increased instrumental vaginal delivery rates and caesarean section rates. METHODS/

designWomen with a pregnancy complicated by pregnancy induced hypertension or mild preeclampsia at a gestational age between 36+0 and 41+0 weeks will be asked to participate in a multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Women will be randomised to either induction of labour or expectant management for spontaneous delivery. The primary outcome of this study is severe maternal morbidity, which can be complicated by maternal mortality in rare cases. Secondary outcome measures are neonatal mortality and morbidity, caesarean and vaginal instrumental delivery rates, maternal quality of life and costs. Analysis will be by intention to treat. In total, 720 pregnant women have to be randomised to show a reduction in severe maternal complications of hypertensive disease from 12 to 6%. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide evidence as to whether or not induction of labour in women with pregnancy induced hypertension or mild preeclampsia (nearly) at term is an effective treatment to prevent severe maternal complications.

trial registrationThe protocol is registered in the clinical trial register number ISRCTN08132825.

Indexed as

Pregnancy OutcomeResearch DesignTerm BirthAdultConfidence IntervalsFemaleHumansHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedInfant, NewbornInfant WelfareLabor, InducedMaternal WelfareMulticenter Studies as TopicPre-EclampsiaPregnancyQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID17662114
PMCPMC1950708
OpenAlexW2119040593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.