Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17662044›Full record

ArticleImmunology2007

Characterization of human invariant natural killer T subsets in health and disease using a novel invariant natural killer T cell-clonotypic monoclonal antibody, 6B11.

Carlos J Montoya, David Pollard, Jeffrey Martinson, Kumud Kumari, Clive Wasserfall, Candice B Mulder, Maria T Rugeles, Mark A Atkinson, Alan L Landay, S Brian Wilson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immunology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 143 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
143citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

143 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 232 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Human CD4Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

83 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Carlos J MontoyaDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA. cjmonto@epm.net.co
David Pollard
Jeffrey Martinson
Kumud Kumari
Clive Wasserfall
Candice B Mulder
Maria T Rugeles
Mark A Atkinson
Alan L Landay
S Brian Wilson
Rush University Medical Center · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversidad de Antioquia · COUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Regulation of iNKT and APC InteractionsR01AI045051 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WILSON, S. BRIAN BRIAN · 1999 to 2009
$2.7M
Basic and Clinical Studies of CpG ODN in HIV DiseaseP01AI055793 · NIAID · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI LANDAY, ALAN L · 2003 to 2004
$2.2M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI055793NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI045051NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI45051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of human CD1d-restricted T-cell receptor (TCR)-invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells has been dependent on utilizing combinations of monoclonal antibodies or CD1d tetramers, which do not allow for the most specific analysis of this T-cell subpopulation. A novel monoclonal antibody (clone 6B11), specific for the invariant CDR3 loop of human canonical Valpha24Jalpha18 TCR alpha chain, was developed and used to specifically characterize iNKT cells. In healthy individuals studied for up to 1 year, a wide but stable frequency of circulating iNKT cells (range: 0.01-0.92%) was observed, with no differences in frequency by gender. Four stable iNKT cell subsets were characterized in peripheral blood based on the expression of CD4 and CD8, with CD8(+) iNKT cells being a phenotypic and functionally different subset from CD4(+) and double negative iNKT cells; in particular, LAG-3 was preferentially expressed on CD8(+) iNKT cells. In addition, a strong negative linear correlation between the frequency of total iNKT cells and percentage of the CD4(+) subset was observed. In terms of their potential association with disease, patients at risk for type 1 diabetes had significantly expanded frequencies of double negative iNKT cells when compared to matched controls and first-degree relatives. Moreover, peripheral blood CD4(+) iNKT cells were the highest producers of interleukin-4, while the production of interferon-gamma and tumour necrosis factor-alpha was similar amongst all iNKT cell subsets. These differences in iNKT cell subsets suggest that in humans the relative ratio of iNKT cell subsets may influence susceptibility vs. resistance to immune-mediated diseases.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, Differentiation, B-LymphocyteCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCytokinesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Disease SusceptibilityFemaleFlow CytometryHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIHumansImmunophenotypingKiller Cells, NaturalMaleAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, Differentiation, B-LymphocyteCytokinesHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIinvariant chain

Identifiers

PMID17662044
PMCPMC2265989
OpenAlexW1977677274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.