Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17660565›Full record

ArticleGenetics2007

Positive selection near an inversion breakpoint on the neo-X chromosome of Drosophila americana.

Amy L Evans, Paulina A Mena, Bryant F McAllister

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amy L EvansDepartment of Biological Sciences and the Roy J. Carver Center for Comparative Genomics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA.
Paulina A Mena
Bryant F McAllister

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unique features of heteromorphic sex chromosomes are produced as a consequence of sex-linked transmission. Alternative models concerning the evolution of sex chromosomes can be classified in terms of genetic drift or positive selection being the primary mechanism of divergence between this chromosomal pair. This study examines early changes on a newly acquired chromosomal arm of the X in Drosophila americana, which was derived from a centromeric fusion between the ancestral X and previously autosomal chromosome 4 (element B). Breakpoints of a chromosomal inversion In(4)a, which is restricted to the neo-X, are identified and used to guide a sequence analysis along chromosome 4. Loci flanking the distal breakpoint exhibit patterns of sequence diversity consistent with neutral evolution, yet loci near the proximal breakpoint reveal distinct imprints of positive selection within the neo-X chromosomal class containing In(4)a. Data from six separate positions examined throughout the proximal region reveal a pattern of recent turnover driven by two independent sweeps among chromosomes with the inverted gene arrangement. Selection-mediated establishment of an extended haplotype associated with recombination-suppressing inversions on the neo-X indicates a pattern of active coadaptation apparently initiated by X-linked transmission and potentially sustained by intralocus sexual conflict.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceBiological EvolutionChromosome BreakageChromosome InversionDNA PrimersDrosophilaFemaleGene RearrangementGenetic VariationHaplotypesMaleModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataPolymorphism, GeneticRecombination, GeneticDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID17660565
PMCPMC2147947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.