Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17660363›Full record

ReviewEukaryotic cell2007

Mitosis, not just open or closed.

Colin P C De Souza, Stephen A Osmani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eukaryotic cell, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mitotic spindle membranes.Molecular biology of the cell · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A Yeast Mitotic Tale for the Nucleus and the Vacuoles to Embrace.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Nuclear envelope remodelling during mitosis.Current opinion in cell biology · 2021
    Review
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Colin P C De SouzaDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Ohio State University, 496 W. 12th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA. de-souza.1@osu.edu
Stephen A Osmani

Funding

The role of the NIMA kinase in mitotic regulationR01GM042564 · NIGMS · WEIS CENTER FOR RESEARCH-GEISINGER CLINC · PI OSMANI, STEPHEN A · 1989 to 2013
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 042564NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM042564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Active Transport, Cell NucleusMitosisFungiNuclear Pore

Identifiers

PMID17660363
PMCPMC2043359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.