Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17660202›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2007

Consensus Data Mining (CDM) Protein Secondary Structure Prediction Server: combining GOR V and Fragment Database Mining (FDM).

Haitao Cheng, Taner Z Sen, Robert L Jernigan, Andrzej Kloczkowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Template-based protein modeling: recent methodological advances.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2010
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haitao ChengDepartment of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Molecular Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Taner Z Sen
Robert L Jernigan
Andrzej Kloczkowski

Funding

Coarse-Grained Models of ProteinsR01GM072014 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JERNIGAN, ROBERT L · 2004 to 2012
$2.3M
Modeling Ribosomal Control, Function and AssemblyR01GM073095 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JERNIGAN, ROBERT L · 2006 to 2009
$1.0M
Discovery of Protein Seq.Struct.Func.RelationshipsR33GM066387 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HONAVAR, VASANT G. · 2005 to 2006
$545k
Protein Sequence Structure Function RelationshipsR21GM066387 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HONAVAR, VASANT G. · 2003 to 2004
$291k
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM072014NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072014NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM073095NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM066387NIGMS NIH HHS R33 GM066387NIGMS NIH HHS R33GM066387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the challenges in protein secondary structure prediction is to overcome the cross-validated 80% prediction accuracy barrier. Here, we propose a novel approach to surpass this barrier. Instead of using a single algorithm that relies on a limited data set for training, we combine two complementary methods having different strengths: Fragment Database Mining (FDM) and GOR V. FDM harnesses the availability of the known protein structures in the Protein Data Bank and provides highly accurate secondary structure predictions when sequentially similar structural fragments are identified. In contrast, the GOR V algorithm is based on information theory, Bayesian statistics, and PSI-BLAST multiple sequence alignments to predict the secondary structure of residues inside a sliding window along a protein chain. A combination of these two different methods benefits from the large number of structures in the PDB and significantly improves the secondary structure prediction accuracy, resulting in Q3 ranging from 67.5 to 93.2%, depending on the availability of highly similar fragments in the Protein Data Bank.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinModels, ChemicalComputer SimulationConsensus SequenceInformation Storage and RetrievalInternetModels, MolecularPeptide FragmentsProteinsProtein Structure, SecondarySequence Analysis, ProteinPeptide FragmentsProteins

Identifiers

PMID17660202
PMCPMC2553684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.