Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17659183›Full record

ReviewNeurologic clinics2007

Genetics of Alzheimer's disease: a centennial review.

Nilüfer Ertekin-Taner

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurologic clinics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 233 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. In vivo validation of late-onset Alzheimer's disease genetic risk factors.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The Role of Proteolysis in Amyloidosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nilüfer Ertekin-TanerDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. taner.nilufer@mayo.edu
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

Mapping Novel Genes for Late-Onset Alzheimer's DiseaseF32AG020903 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC JACKSONVILLE · PI ERTEKIN-TANER, NILUFER · 2002 to 2008
$129k
NIA NIH HHS F32 AG020903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) genetics may be one of the most prolifically published areas in medicine and biology. Three early-onset AD genes with causative mutations (APP, PSEN1, PSEN2) and one late-onset AD susceptibility gene, apolipoprotein E (APOE), exist with ample biologic, genetic, and epidemiologic data. Evidence suggests a significant genetic component underlying AD that is not explained by the known genetic risk factors. This article summarizes the evidence for the genetic component in AD and the identification of the early-onset familial AD genes and APOE, and examines the current state of knowledge about additional AD susceptibility loci and alleles. The future directions for genetic research in AD as a common and complex condition are also discussed.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGenetic MarkersGenome, HumanAgedAlzheimer DiseaseHumansGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID17659183
PMCPMC2735049
OpenAlexW2064579827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.