Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17658942›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2007

Evolution of function in the "two dinucleotide binding domains" flavoproteins.

Sunil Ojha, Elaine C Meng, Patricia C Babbitt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Role of theAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Quinone binding site in a type VI sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Small protein folds at the root of an ancient metabolic network.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Pyridine Nucleotide Coenzyme Specificity ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Evolutionary and molecular foundations of multiple contemporary functions of the nitroreductase superfamily.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sunil OjhaDepartment of Biopharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Elaine C Meng
Patricia C Babbitt
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Laying the Foundation of Genomic EnzymologyR01GM060595 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BABBITT, PATRICIA CLEMENT · 2000 to 2018
$5.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM60595NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM060595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural and biochemical constraints force some segments of proteins to evolve more slowly than others, often allowing identification of conserved structural or sequence motifs that can be associated with substrate binding properties, chemical mechanisms, and molecular functions. We have assessed the functional and structural constraints imposed by cofactors on the evolution of new functions in a superfamily of flavoproteins characterized by two-dinucleotide binding domains, the "two dinucleotide binding domains" flavoproteins (tDBDF) superfamily. Although these enzymes catalyze many different types of oxidation/reduction reactions, each is initiated by a stereospecific hydride transfer reaction between two cofactors, a pyridine nucleotide and flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD). Sequence and structural analysis of more than 1,600 members of the superfamily reveals new members and identifies details of the evolutionary connections among them. Our analysis shows that in all of the highly divergent families within the superfamily, these cofactors adopt a conserved configuration optimal for stereospecific hydride transfer that is stabilized by specific interactions with amino acids from several motifs distributed among both dinucleotide binding domains. The conservation of cofactor configuration in the active site restricts the pyridine nucleotide to interact with FAD from the re-side, limiting the flow of electrons from the re-side to the si-side. This directionality of electron flow constrains interactions with the different partner proteins of different families to occur on the same face of the cofactor binding domains. As a result, superimposing the structures of tDBDFs aligns not only these interacting proteins, but also their constituent electron acceptors, including heme and iron-sulfur clusters. Thus, not only are specific aspects of the cofactor-directed chemical mechanism conserved across the superfamily, the constraints they impose are manifested in the mode of protein-protein interactions. Overlaid on this foundation of conserved interactions, nature has conscripted different protein partners to serve as electron acceptors, thereby generating diversification of function across the superfamily.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsAllosteric SiteCatalytic DomainCoenzymesConserved SequenceDinucleoside PhosphatesElectron-Transferring FlavoproteinsFlavin-Adenine DinucleotideSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, ProteinSequence Homology, Amino AcidStructure-Activity RelationshipCoenzymesDinucleoside PhosphatesElectron-Transferring FlavoproteinsFlavin-Adenine Dinucleotide

Identifiers

PMID17658942
PMCPMC1924876
OpenAlexW2080687826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.