Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17658909›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2007

Sustained-release ophthalmic drug delivery systems for treatment of macular disorders: present and future applications.

Blake A Booth, Lori Vidal Denham, Saadallah Bouhanik, Jean T Jacob, James M Hill

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sustained release micellar carrier systems for iontophoretic transport of dexamethasone across human sclera.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2012
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Blake A BoothDepartment of Ophthalmology, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Lori Vidal Denham
Saadallah Bouhanik
Jean T Jacob
James M Hill
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USTulane University · US

Funding

OCULAR HSV: LATENCY, REACTIVATION, &RECURRENCER01EY006311 · NEI · LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER · PI LUKIW, WALTER J · 1985 to 2012
$5.3M
PHARMACOLOGY AND EXTERNAL OCULAR DISEASEP30EY002377 · NEI · LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER · PI THOMPSON, HILARY W · 1985 to 2008
$4.9M
Regulation and Cell Biology of Beta-SecretaseR01AG023055 · NIA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI SAMBAMURTI, KUMAR · 2004 to 2008
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS EY02377NEI NIH HHS NEI-EY-006311NIA NIH HHS NIA-AG-23055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macular disease currently poses the greatest threat to vision in aging populations. Historically, most of this pathology could only be dealt with surgically, and then only after much damage to the macula had already occurred. Current pathophysiological insights into macular diseases have allowed the development of effective new pharmacotherapies. The field of drug delivery systems has advanced over the last several years with emphasis placed on controlled release of drug to specific areas of the eye. Its unique location and tendency toward chronic disease make the macula an important and attractive target for drug delivery systems, especially sustained-release systems. This review evaluates the current literature on the research and development of sustained-release posterior segment drug delivery systems that are primarily intended for macular disease with an emphasis on age-related macular degeneration.Current effective therapies include corticosteroids and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor compounds. Recent successes have been reported using anti-angiogenic drugs for therapy of age-related macular degeneration. This review also includes information on implantable devices (biodegradable and non-biodegradable), the use of injected particles (microspheres and liposomes) and future enhanced drug delivery systems, such as ultrasound drug delivery. The devices reviewed show significant drug release over a period of days or weeks. However, macular disorders are chronic diseases requiring years of treatment. Currently, there is no 'gold standard' for therapy and/or drug delivery. Future studies will focus on improving the efficiency and effectiveness of drug delivery to the posterior chamber. If successful, therapeutic modalities will significantly delay loss of vision and improve the quality of life for patients with chronic macular disorders.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansMacular DegenerationMiddle AgedOphthalmic SolutionsTechnology, PharmaceuticalDelayed-Action PreparationsOphthalmic Solutions

Identifiers

PMID17658909
OpenAlexW33236977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.