Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17653795›Full record

ReviewMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2007

The power of comparative and developmental studies for mouse models of Down syndrome.

Clara S Moore, Randall J Roper

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Influence of allelic differences in Down syndrome.Progress in brain research · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Commonality in Down and fetal alcohol syndromes.Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology · 2013
    Article
  11. Deficits in cognition and synaptic plasticity in a mouse model of Down syndrome ameliorated by GABAB receptor antagonists.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Clara S MooreDepartment of Biology, Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17604, USA. clara.moore@email.fandm.edu
Randall J Roper
Franklin & Marshall College · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

Analysis of Cardiac Development in Ts65Dn MiceR15HL081099 · NHLBI · FRANKLIN AND MARSHALL COLLEGE · PI MOORE, CLARA S · 2006 to 2006
$190k
NHLBI NIH HHS HL081099NHLBI NIH HHS R15 HL081099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the genetic basis for Down syndrome (DS) was described, understanding the causative relationship between genes at dosage imbalance and phenotypes associated with DS has been a principal goal of researchers studying trisomy 21 (Ts21). Though inferences to the gene-phenotype relationship in humans have been made, evidence linking a specific gene or region to a particular congenital phenotype has been limited. To further understand the genetic basis for DS phenotypes, mouse models with three copies of human chromosome 21 (Hsa21) orthologs have been developed. Mouse models offer access to every tissue at each stage of development, opportunity to manipulate genetic content, and ability to precisely quantify phenotypes. Numerous approaches to recreate trisomic composition and analyze phenotypes similar to DS have resulted in diverse trisomic mouse models. A murine intraspecies comparative analysis of different genetic models of Ts21 and specific DS phenotypes reveals the complexity of trisomy and important considerations to understand the etiology of and strategies for amelioration or prevention of trisomic phenotypes. By analyzing individual phenotypes in different mouse models throughout development, such as neurologic, craniofacial, and cardiovascular abnormalities, greater insight into the gene-phenotype relationship has been demonstrated. In this review we discuss how phenotype-based comparisons between DS mouse models have been useful in analyzing the relationship of trisomy and DS phenotypes.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalMiceAnimalsCognitionCraniofacial AbnormalitiesDown SyndromeGene Expression ProfilingHeartPhenotypeSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID17653795
PMCPMC1998891
OpenAlexW2141593169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.