Trial reportGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2007
Triamcinolone versus inner-limiting membrane peeling in persistent diabetic macular edema (TIME study): design issues and implications.
Trial report in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intravitreal steroids for macular edema in diabetes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTreatment options for persistent diabetic macular edema remain disappointing. ILM peeling and intravitreal triamcinolone have been successfully used in several case series; however, there is no evidence that one of these options is superior for specific groups of patients. The triamcinolone versus ILM peeling in diabetic macular edema study (TIME-study) is designed to investigate the efficacy of these two treatments in patients with persistent diabetic macular edema.
methodsPatients with persistent diabetic macular edema are randomised to either the control group (no treatment), ppV + ILM peeling, or triamcinolone (4 mg) injection. One hundred thirty-five patients are to be recruited per group and followed-up for one year. The main endpoints are defined as change in visual acuity (VA) at 12 months compared to baseline and the change in retinal thickness after 3 months follow-up. Secondary endpoints include differences in the functional success and anatomical success and the effect of the treatment on the patient's quality of life. Twelve institutions (28 surgeons) in 3 European countries agreed to contribute to the study.
resultsThe design issues and implications of the study are described.
conclusionsThe TIME study is the first randomised prospective clinical trial to investigate the effectiveness of the two treatment methods. The results of this study should enable physicians to improve therapy and to select cases according to the most promising treatment option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.