ArticleLa Radiologia medica2007
Imaging patients with chronic kidney disease: CIN or NSF?
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Value of orthogonal axial MR images in preoperative T staging of gastric cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Article
- R2* value derived from multi-echo Dixon technique can aid discrimination between benign and malignant focal liver lesions.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Toxicity Evaluation of a Novel Magnetic Resonance Imaging Marker, CoCl2-N-Acetylcysteine, in Rats.Journal of toxicology · 2018Article
- Off-label use of intravascular iodinated organic and MR contrast media.La Radiologia medica · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) frequently require contrast-enhanced imaging studies in order to manage their condition. Radiologists are often confronted with selecting the best imaging modality for each patient based on the patient's degree of renal impairment. In the past, when patients required a contrast-enhanced imaging study, the tendency was to select magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with a gadolinium (Gd)-based contrast agent over computed tomography (CT) with iodinated contrast media (CM) due to the known nephrotoxic nature of iodinated CM, which is associated in some patients with the development of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). However, recently, the administration of Gd-based contrast agents has been associated with a severe, potentially fatal, adverse reaction, termed nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF), in patients with moderate-to-severe renal insufficiency. Therefore, this same patient population is now at risk for developing either CIN or NSF. In order to optimise patient outcomes, imaging of patients with CKD requires an understanding of the risk factors for both CIN and NSF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.