Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17652796›Full record

ArticleEndocrine pathology2007

Cytokeratins 7 and 20 immunoexpression profile in goblet cell and classical carcinoids of appendix.

Khaled O Alsaad, Stefano Serra, Anja Schmitt, Aurel Perren, Runjan Chetty

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine pathology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Goblet cell carcinoids of the appendix.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2013
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Goblet cell carcinoid tumors of the appendix: An overview.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2010
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Khaled O AlsaadDepartment of Pathology, University Health Network/Toronto Medical Laboratories, The Toronto General Hospital, 200 Elizabeth Street, 11th Floor, Eaton Wing, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada.
Stefano Serra
Anja Schmitt
Aurel Perren
Runjan Chetty
University Health Network · CAUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHToronto General Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Goblet cell carcinoid (GCC) of the vermiform appendix is an uncommon neoplasm and its histogenesis is controversial. Whether GCC represents a morphological variant of classical appendiceal carcinoid or a mucin-producing adenocarcinoma is still conjectural. Little is known about the immunohistochemical expression of cytokeratins 7 (CK7) and 20 (CK20) in appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors. In this study, we compared the expression of CK7 and CK20 in 17 cases of appendiceal GCC and 25 cases of classical carcinoid. The tumors were also evaluated for Ki-67 proliferation index, mitotic activity, tumor necrosis, extracellular pools of mucin, obvious intestinal type adenocarcinomatous foci, angiolymphatic permeation, perineural/neural infiltration, and the depth of invasion of the appendix wall. Mesoappendiceal extension was present in 14 of 17 (82.3%) cases of GCC, whereas angiolymphatic and perineural/intraaneural involvement were found in 10 of 17 (58.8%) and 14 of 17 (82.3%) cases, respectively. The mitotic count ranged from 0 per 10 high power fields to 6 per 10 high power fields, with an average of 1.4 per 10 high power fields. Necrosis was not seen in any case and pools of extravasated mucin were present in 5 of 17 (29.4%) cases. Immunohistochemically, all 17 (100%) of GCC exhibited strong and diffuse immunopositivity for CK20, whereas expression of CK7 was present in 12 cases (70.5%), ranging from 5 to 50% of tumor cells being labeled. The Ki-67 labeling index ranged from 0 to 75% and showed no correlation to mitotic activity, angiolymphatic invasion or perineural/intraneural permeation. On the other hand, 25 cases of classical carcinoid tumors were consistently negative for CK7; however, 4 cases (16%) showed immunolabeling for CK20 in 25-50% of the tumor cells. The Ki-67 labeling index in classical carcinoids ranged from 0 to 5%. This study shows that in addition to the morphological differences, GCC (CK7/CK20-positive) and classical carcinoid (CK7/CK20-negative) differ in their expression of CK7 and CK20. In addition, GCC shows the same CK7/CK20 immunoexpression as colorectal adenocarcinoma. Goblet cell carcinoid should be regarded as a crypt cell or an amphicrine carcinoma rather than a variant of carcinoid tumor, a lesion that has benign connotations.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAppendiceal NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoid TumorCell ProliferationFemaleGoblet CellsHumansImmunohistochemistryKeratin-20Keratin-7Ki-67 AntigenMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorKeratin-20Keratin-7Ki-67 Antigen

Identifiers

PMID17652796
OpenAlexW2088144664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.