Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17652247›Full record

Trial reportTobacco control2007

The 5A's vs 3A's plus proactive quitline referral in private practice dental offices: preliminary results.

Judith S Gordon, Judy A Andrews, Karen M Crews, Thomas J Payne, Herbert H Severson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Tobacco control, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00384254 (Tobacco Quitlines as an Adjunct to Dental Office Tobacco Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00384254 phase2completednot on this map

Tobacco Quitlines as an Adjunct to Dental Office Tobacco Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorOregon Research InstituteRan2004 to 2008Enrolled2,177ConditionsTobacco Use CessationArms5 A, 3 A
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for tobacco cessation delivered by dental professionals.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Telephone counselling for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. A smoking cessation intervention plus proactive quitline referral in the pediatric emergency department: a pilot study.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2008
    Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Tobacco Use Cessation and Prevention - A Review.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Judith S GordonOregon Research Institute, 1715 Franklin Blvd, Eugene, OR 97405, USA. judith@ori.org
Judy A Andrews
Karen M Crews
Thomas J Payne
Herbert H Severson
Oregon Research Institute · USUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · US

Funding

Tobacco Quitlines: An Adjunct to Dental InterventionsR01DA017972 · NIDA · OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GORDON, JUDITH S · 2003 to 2006
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA017972
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe primary aim of our randomised control trial (RCT) was to evaluate the relative efficacy of two dental office based interventions compared to usual care. One intervention consisted of a combination of dental practitioner advice to quit and proactive telephone counselling (3A's), and the other arm consisted of a dental practitioner delivered intervention based on the 5A's of the Clinical Practice Guideline (5A's).

method2177 tobacco using patients were enrolled from 68 dental practices in Mississippi. We collected 3-month outcome data from 76% (n = 1652) of participants.

resultsSmokers in the two intervention conditions quit at a higher rate than those in usual care; chi2 (1, n = 1381) = 3.10, p<0.05. Although not significant, more patients in the 5A's condition quit than those in the 3A's. Of patients in the 3A's Condition, 50% reported being asked by their dentist or hygienists about fax referral to the quitline, and 35% were referred. Quitline counsellors contacted 143 (70%) referred participants.

conclusionThese results suggest that there are both advantages and disadvantages to the use of quitlines as an adjunct to brief counselling provided by dental practitioners. Patients receiving quitline counselling quit at higher rates than those who did not; however, only a small percentage of patients received counselling from the quitline. Therefore, it appears that dental professionals may be most effective in helping their patients to quit by regularly providing the 5A's plus proactively referring only those patients who are highly motivated to a quitline for more intensive counselling.

Indexed as

HotlinesCounselingDentistryFemaleHumansMaleMississippiPractice Guidelines as TopicPrivate PracticeReferral and ConsultationSmoking CessationTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID17652247
PMCPMC2598528
OpenAlexW1965400615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.