Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17650471›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2007

Landscape epidemiology of plant diseases.

Manuel Plantegenest, Christophe Le May, Frédéric Fabre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The socio-economic challenges of managing pathogen evolution in agriculture.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cross-species pathogen spillover across ecosystem boundaries: mechanisms and theory.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Updated pest categorisation ofEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Manuel PlantegenestUMR INRA/Agrocampus Rennes 1099 [BIO3P], 65, rue de Saint-Brieuc, CS 84215, 35042 Rennes, France. manuel.plantegenest@rennes.inra.fr
Christophe Le May
Frédéric Fabre

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many agricultural landscapes are characterized by a high degree of heterogeneity and fragmentation. Landscape ecology focuses on the influence of habitat heterogeneity in space and time on ecological processes. Landscape epidemiology aims at applying concepts and approaches originating from landscape ecology to the study of pathogen dynamics at the landscape scale. However, despite the strong influence that the landscape properties may have on the spread of plant diseases, landscape epidemiology has still received little attention from plant pathologists. Some recent methodological and technological progress provides new and powerful tools to describe and analyse the spatial patterns of host-pathogen interactions. Here, we review some important topics in plant pathology that may benefit from a landscape perspective. These include the influence of: landscape composition on the global inoculum pressure; landscape heterogeneity on pathogen dynamics; landscape structure on pathogen dispersal; and landscape properties on the emergence of pathogens and on their evolution.

Indexed as

AgricultureBacteriaBiological EvolutionDemographyPesticidesPlant DiseasesPlant VirusesPesticides

Identifiers

PMID17650471
PMCPMC2394555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.