Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1764971›Full record

ArticleChromosoma1991

Induction of multipolar mitoses in cultured cells: decay and restructuring of the mitotic apparatus and distribution of centrioles.

I B Alieva, I A Vorobjev

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosoma, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Centrosome amplification, chromosomal instability and cancer: mechanistic, clinical and therapeutic issues.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2016
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

I B AlievaA.N. Belozersky Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow State University, USSR.
I A Vorobjev
Lomonosov Moscow State University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During recovery after a long (up to 12 h) treatment of pig embryo culture cells (PK) with nocodazole at concentrations of 0.02 microgram/ml and 0.2 microgram/ml all c-metaphase cells divide normally into two daughter cells. During recovery after a short (1-4 h) treatment with 0.6 microgram/ml nocodazole only multipolar mitoses (as a rule tripolar) arise. At the ultrastructural level, the increasing nocodazole concentration leads to progressive disruption of the mitotic spindle. At a nocodazole concentration of 0.2 microgram/ml kinetochores are not associated with microtubules. At a nocodazole concentration of 0.6 microgram/ml there are no microtubules around the centrosomes, and in every cell one of the two diplosomes disintegrates. In tripolar telophase centrioles are distributed among the spindle poles generally in a 2:2:0 pattern. Mother and daughter centrioles are always disoriented but not separated. The centriole-free pole contains a cloud of electron-dense material. During tripolar division two of the three daughter cells mainly fuse shortly after telophase forming one binucleate cell. Thus a multipolar mitosis arises as a result of the uncoupling of mother centrioles and spindle microtubules, but not of the duration of the c-mitotic arrest. Centriole-free poles account for the divergence of chromosomes, but mainly they are unable to ensure the normal cytokinesis of daughter cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsCells, CulturedCentriolesKineticsMetaphaseMicroscopy, ElectronMitosisNocodazoleSpindle ApparatusSwineNocodazole

Identifiers

PMID1764971
OpenAlexW2025591465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.