Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17647065›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2007

Beyond comorbidity counts: how do comorbidity type and severity influence diabetes patients' treatment priorities and self-management?

Eve A Kerr, Michele Heisler, Sarah L Krein, Mohammed Kabeto, Kenneth M Langa, David Weir, John D Piette

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 171 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
171citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

171 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

111 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eve A KerrVA HSR&D Center of Excellence, VA Ann Arbor Health Care System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. ekerr@umich.edu
Michele Heisler
Sarah L Krein
Mohammed Kabeto
Kenneth M Langa
David Weir
John D Piette

Funding

HRS Yrs29-34: Y33 SSA CoFundingU01AG009740 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Jessica Faul, KENNETH M LANGA · 1990 to 2026
$555.8M
PUBLIC HEALTH DEMONSTRATIONP60DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MYERS, MARTIN G · 1985 to 2012
$26.5M
IDENTIFYING CASES AND COSTS OF DEMENTIA IN THE U.S.K08AG019180 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LANGA, KENNETH M · 2001 to 2005
$634k
NIA NIH HHS K08 AG019180NIA NIH HHS K08 AG19180NIA NIH HHS U01 AG009740NIA NIH HHS U01 AG09740NIDDK NIH HHS P60 DK020572NIDDK NIH HHS P60DK-20572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe majority of older adults have 2 or more chronic conditions and among patients with diabetes, 40% have at least three.

objectiveWe sought to understand how the number, type, and severity of comorbidities influence diabetes patients' self-management and treatment priorities.

designCross-sectional observation study. PATIENTS: A total of 1,901 diabetes patients who responded to the 2003 Health and Retirement Study (HRS) diabetes survey. MEASUREMENTS: We constructed multivariate models to assess the association between presence of comorbidities and each of 2 self-reported outcomes, diabetes prioritization and self-management ability, controlling for patient demographics. Comorbidity was characterized first by a count of all comorbid conditions, then by the presence of specific comorbidity subtypes (microvascular, macrovascular, and non-diabetes related), and finally by severity of 1 serious comorbidity: heart failure (HF).

results40% of respondents had at least 1 microvascular comorbidity, 79% at least 1 macrovascular comorbidity, and 61% at least 1 non-diabetes-related comorbidity. Patients with a greater overall number of comorbidities placed lower priority on diabetes and had worse diabetes self-management ability scores. However, only macrovascular and non-diabetes-related comorbidities, but not microvascular comorbidities, were associated with lower diabetes prioritization, whereas higher numbers of microvascular, macrovascular, and non-diabetes-related conditions were all associated with lower diabetes self-management ability scores. Severe, but not mild, HF was associated with lower diabetes prioritization and self-management scores.

conclusionsThe type and severity of comorbid conditions, and not just the comorbidity count, influence diabetes patients' self-management. Patients with severely symptomatic comorbidities and those with conditions they consider to be unrelated to diabetes may need additional support in making decisions about care priorities and self-management activities.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthComorbiditySelf CareAgedCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes MellitusFemaleHealth PrioritiesHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness IndexUnited States

Identifiers

PMID17647065
PMCPMC2219819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.