ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2007
Information theory applied to the sparse gene ontology annotation network to predict novel gene function.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
71 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extracellular Nicotinamide Phosphoribosyltransferase Is a Therapeutic Target in Experimental Necrotizing Enterocolitis.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Learning sequence, structure, and function representations of proteins with language models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- The eNAMPT/TLR4 inflammatory cascade drives the severity of intra-amniotic inflammation in pregnancy and predicts infant outcomes.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Epithelial cell responses to rhinovirus identify an early-life-onset asthma phenotype in adults.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2022Article
- HESML: a real-time semantic measures library for the biomedical domain with a reproducible survey.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- 'Single-subject studies'-derived analyses unveil altered biomechanisms between very small cohorts: implications for rare diseases.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Gene function finding through cross-organism ensemble learning.BioData mining · 2021Article
- Predicting functions of maize proteins using graph convolutional network.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Rhinovirus Infections in Individuals with Asthma Increase ACE2 Expression and Cytokine Pathways Implicated in COVID-19.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2020Article
- A Literature Review of Gene Function Prediction by Modeling Gene Ontology.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Review
- Integrated entropy-based approach for analyzing exons and introns in DNA sequences.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Handling Big Data Scalability in Biological Domain Using Parallel and Distributed Processing: A Case of Three Biological Semantic Similarity Measures.BioMed research international · 2019Article
- Precision drug repurposing via convergent eQTL-based molecules and pathway targeting independent disease-associated polymorphisms.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2019Article
- Testing for differentially expressed genetic pathways with single-subject N-of-1 data in the presence of inter-gene correlation.Statistical methods in medical research · 2018Article
- Convergent downstream candidate mechanisms of independent intergenic polymorphisms between co-classified diseases implicate epistasis among noncoding elements.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2018Article
- NoGOA: predicting noisy GO annotations using evidences and sparse representation.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- kMEn: Analyzing noisy and bidirectional transcriptional pathway responses in single subjects.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2017Article
- Protein Function Prediction Using Deep Restricted Boltzmann Machines.BioMed research international · 2017Article
- Word-of-Mouth Innovation: Hypothesis Generation for Supplement Repurposing based on Consumer Reviews.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2017Article
- The effects of shared information on semantic calculations in the gene ontology.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2017Article
11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationDespite advances in the gene annotation process, the functions of a large portion of gene products remain insufficiently characterized. In addition, the in silico prediction of novel Gene Ontology (GO) annotations for partially characterized gene functions or processes is highly dependent on reverse genetic or functional genomic approaches. To our knowledge, no prediction method has been demonstrated to be highly accurate for sparsely annotated GO terms (those associated to fewer than 10 genes).
resultsWe propose a novel approach, information theory-based semantic similarity (ITSS), to automatically predict molecular functions of genes based on existing GO annotations. Using a 10-fold cross-validation, we demonstrate that the ITSS algorithm obtains prediction accuracies (precision 97%, recall 77%) comparable to other machine learning algorithms when compared in similar conditions over densely annotated portions of the GO datasets. This method is able to generate highly accurate predictions in sparsely annotated portions of GO, where previous algorithms have failed. As a result, our technique generates an order of magnitude more functional predictions than previous methods. A 10-fold cross validation demonstrated a precision of 90% at a recall of 36% for the algorithm over sparsely annotated networks of the recent GO annotations (about 1400 GO terms and 11,000 genes in Homo sapiens). To our knowledge, this article presents the first historical rollback validation for the predicted GO annotations, which may represent more realistic conditions than more widely used cross-validation approaches. By manually assessing a random sample of 100 predictions conducted in a historical rollback evaluation, we estimate that a minimum precision of 51% (95% confidence interval: 43-58%) can be achieved for the human GO Annotation file dated 2003. AVAILABILITY: The program is available on request. The 97,732 positive predictions of novel gene annotations from the 2005 GO Annotation dataset and other supplementary information is available at http://phenos.bsd.uchicago.edu/ITSS/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.