Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17645880›Full record

ReviewInternational journal for parasitology2007

Comparative genomics: from genotype to disease phenotype in the leishmaniases.

Deborah F Smith, Christopher S Peacock, Angela K Cruz

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal for parasitology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
14.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Neutrophil elastase promotesFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Dependence ofJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The genome sequence of Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis: functional annotation and extended analysis of gene models.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2013
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Leishmania RNA virus: when the host pays the toll.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Deborah F SmithImmunology and Infection Unit, Department of Biology/Hull York Medical School, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5YW, UK. dfs501@york.ac.uk
Christopher S Peacock
Angela K Cruz
Hull York Medical School · GBUniversidade de São Paulo · BRWellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 076355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent progress in sequencing the genomes of several Leishmania species, causative agents of cutaneous, mucocutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis, is revealing unusual features of potential relevance to parasite virulence and pathogenesis in the host. While the genomes of Leishmania major, Leishmania braziliensis and Leishmania infantum are highly similar in content and organisation, species-specific genes and mechanisms distinguish one from another. In particular, the presence of retrotransposons and the components of a putative RNA interference machinery in L. braziliensis suggest the potential for both greater diversity and more tractable experimentation in this Leishmania Viannia species.

Indexed as

Genome, ProtozoanAnimalsHost-Parasite InteractionsLeishmaniaLeishmaniasisPhenotypeRetroelementsSpecies SpecificityRetroelements

Identifiers

PMID17645880
PMCPMC2696322
OpenAlexW2064797931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.