Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17644581›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2007

Characterization and comparison of biofilm development by pathogenic and commensal isolates of Histophilus somni.

Indra Sandal, Wenzhou Hong, W Edward Swords, Thomas J Inzana

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The Role ofInfection and immunity · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Polymicrobial Biofilm Interaction BetweenFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Closed Genome Sequences of SevenGenome announcements · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Histophilosis as a Natural Disease.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Indra SandalCenter for Molecular Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1800 Kraft Dr., Suite 200, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Wenzhou Hong
W Edward Swords
Thomas J Inzana
Virginia Tech · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

Bacterial biofilms in otitis mediaR01DC007444 · NIDCD · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SWORDS, WILLIAM E · 2005 to 2014
$2.9M
Bacterial host mimicry and chronic airway infectionR01AI054425 · NIAID · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SWORDS, WILLIAM E · 2005 to 2009
$1.4M
NIAID NIH HHS AI054425NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI054425NIDCD NIH HHS DC007444NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC007444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histophilus somni (Haemophilus somnus) is an obligate inhabitant of the mucosal surfaces of bovines and sheep and an opportunistic pathogen responsible for respiratory disease, meningoencephalitis, myocarditis, arthritis, and other systemic infections. The identification of an exopolysaccharide produced by H. somni prompted us to evaluate whether the bacterium was capable of forming a biofilm. After growth in polyvinyl chloride wells a biofilm was formed by all strains examined, although most isolates from systemic sites produced more biofilm than commensal isolates from the prepuce. Biofilms of pneumonia isolate strain 2336 and commensal isolate strain 129Pt were grown in flow cells, followed by analysis by confocal laser scanning microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Both strains formed biofilms that went through stages of attachment, growth, maturation, and detachment. However, strain 2336 produced a mature biofilm that consisted of thick, homogenous mound-shaped microcolonies encased in an amorphous extracellular matrix with profound water channels. In contrast, strain 129Pt formed a biofilm of cell clusters that were tower-shaped or distinct filamentous structures intertwined with each other by strands of extracellular matrix. The biofilm of strain 2336 had a mass and thickness that was 5- to 10-fold greater than that of strain 129Pt and covered 75 to 82% of the surface area, whereas the biofilm of strain 129Pt covered 35 to 40% of the surface area. Since H. somni is an obligate inhabitant of the bovine and ovine host, the formation of a biofilm may be crucial to its persistence in vivo, and our in vitro evidence suggests that formation of a more robust biofilm may provide a selective advantage for strains that cause systemic disease.

Indexed as

Bacteriological TechniquesBiofilmsPasteurellaceaeTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID17644581
PMCPMC2168709
OpenAlexW2104567912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.