ArticleVeterinary microbiology2007
The possible influence of LuxS in the in vivo virulence of rabbit enteropathogenic Escherichia coli.
Article in Veterinary microbiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- LuxS-mediated quorum sensing system in Lactobacillus plantarum NMD-17 from koumiss: induction of plantaricin MX in co-cultivation with certain lactic acid bacteria.Folia microbiologica · 2021Article
- Mutation rate plasticity in rifampicin resistance depends on Escherichia coli cell-cell interactions.Nature communications · 2014Article
- Natural genome diversity of AI-2 quorum sensing in Escherichia coli: conserved signal production but labile signal reception.Genome biology and evolution · 2013Article
- Disrupting the luxS quorum sensing gene does not significantly affect Bacillus anthracis virulence in mice or guinea pigs.Virulence · 2012Article
- LuxS promotes biofilm maturation and persistence of nontypeable haemophilus influenzae in vivo via modulation of lipooligosaccharides on the bacterial surface.Infection and immunity · 2009Article
- Perturbation of the small intestine microbial ecology by streptomycin alters pathology in a Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium murine model of infection.Infection and immunity · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Attaching and effacing (A/E) organisms, such as rabbit enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC), human EPEC or enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) share attaching and effacing phenotype and LEE pathogenicity island responsible for A/E. The present study was undertaken to investigate the impact of the LuxS quorum sensing (QS) signaling system in vitro and in vivo pathogenicity of A/E organisms using rabbit EPEC (rEPEC) strain E22 (O103:H2). Analysis of the bioluminescence indicated abolished production of the QS signal AI-2 by luxS mutant (E22DeltaluxS). Strain E22Deltalux also exhibited impaired expression of several normally secreted proteins and reduced adherence to cultured HeLa cells. Complementation of the intact luxS gene to E22DeltaluxS restored secreted protein expression comparable to the WT type but not adherence to HeLa cells. In experimentally infected rabbits, the isogenic luxS mutant induced clinical illness and intimate adherence to the intestinal mucosa, albeit to a less extent, comparable to that seen with the parent virulent strain. It is worth noting that reduced fecal bacterial shedding, mucosal adherence and improved cumulative weight gain were seen for the mutant strain complemented with luxS when compared to the WT. It appears that the luxS gene is not essential for in vivo pathogenicity by rEPEC where exogenous QS signals are present in the gut. The impact of AI-2 provided by multicopy plasmid on bacterial virulence is discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.