"Bonne Année", "Gutes Neues Jahr"? Will 2007 be a "Happy New Year" for children's medicines in Europe?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. A systematic review of the reporting of Data Monitoring Committees' roles, interim analysis and early termination in pediatric clinical trials.BMC pediatrics · 2009
   Pooled it
2. Effect of child health status on parents' allowing children to participate in pediatric research.BMC medical ethics · 2013
   Article
3. Delivering better medicines to children: need for better integration between the science, the policy, and the practice.Paediatric drugs · 2009
   Article
4. Paediatric clinical pharmacology: at the beginning of a new era.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2008
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as