Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17641869›Full record

ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2007

[Sexual dysfunction at urinary incontinence].

J B Korda, M Braun, U H Engelmann

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J B KordaKlinik für Urologie, Klinikum der Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50924 Köln. korda@gmx.net
M Braun
U H Engelmann

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe progress of science in the field of male sexuality stimulated the interest to investigate female sexual function and dysfunction. The understanding of sexuality as a central part of life quality and satisfaction of humans, opened the doors for research of sexuality and sexual disorders. The aim of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of female sexual dysfunction ("FSD") and erectile dysfunction ("ED") in a community population and the relation to urinary incontinence. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe developed 2 questionnaires (men 53 questions, women 55). The IPSS and KEED (Kölner Erfassungsbogen der erektilen Dysfunktion) were integrated in the male questionnaire and the FSFI (Female Sexual Function Index) in the female questionnaire. The questionnaire was send to each 10,000 women and men (age 20-80 years). The response rate in women was 41 and in men 46%, the mean age 43 in women and 53 in men.

resultsThe prevalence of female sexual dysfunction was 38.2%, and it was 19.6% for male sexual dysfunction. 26% of the women and 41.4% of men suffered from urinary incontinence/lower urinary tract symptoms ("LUTS"). The prevalence increased significantly with age. 46.5% of the incontinent women suffered from FSD versus 35.2% of the continent women. 34% of women, who had consulted a physician because of sexual problems in the past, suffered from FSD and urine incontinence. The therapy necessity in general is around 18.4%. There was a statistically significant correlation between LUTS and ED. 31.8% of the men with LUTS suffered from ED versus 10.3% of continent men (p=0.001).

conclusionUp to now this is the largest single center, community based, study of FSD and ED. We could demonstrate a high prevalence of FSD and ED in general and particular in urinary incontinent persons.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesErectile DysfunctionFemaleGermanyHealth SurveysHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSex Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.