The Yin and Yang of COPD: sex/gender differences in the National Emphysema Treatment Trial.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Association between nutrition-related indicators with the risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and all-cause mortality in the elderly population: evidence from NHANES.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024
   Article
2. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Women: A Biologically Focused Review with a Systematic Search Strategy.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2020
   Review
3. Gender differences in COPD: are women more susceptible to smoking effects than men?Thorax · 2010
   Article
4. Systems medicine: the future of medical genomics and healthcare.Genome medicine · 2009
   Article
5. Lung fibroblast repair functions in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are altered by multiple mechanisms.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2008
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Sex differences in severe pulmonary emphysema.2007

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as