ArticleBMC genomics2007
Genotypic variation in genome-wide transcription profiles induced by insect feeding: Brassica oleracea--Pieris rapae interactions.
Article in BMC genomics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.
- Insect herbivory time-course reveals unique temporal transcriptomic responses in resistant and susceptible grapevines.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Defense strategies and associated phytohormonal regulation inFrontiers in plant science · 2024Review
- Current status, breeding strategies and future prospects for managing chilli leaf curl virus disease and associated begomoviruses in Chilli (Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Article
- Organic Farming Sharpens Plant Defenses in the Field.Frontiers in sustainable food systems · 2020Article
- Changes in Content of Polyphenols and Ascorbic Acid in Leaves of White Cabbage after Pest Infestation.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- The early transcriptome response of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) to mealybug (Phenacoccus manihoti) feeding.PloS one · 2018Article
- Transcriptome and metabolome analysis reveal candidate genes and biochemicals involved in tea geometrid defense in Camellia sinensis.PloS one · 2018Article
- Combined biotic stresses trigger similar transcriptomic responses but contrasting resistance against a chewing herbivore in Brassica nigra.BMC plant biology · 2017Article
- Natural variation in life history strategy of Arabidopsis thaliana determines stress responses to drought and insects of different feeding guilds.Molecular ecology · 2017Article
- A Chinese cabbage (Brassica campetris subsp. Chinensis) τ-type glutathione-S-transferase stimulates Arabidopsis development and primes against abiotic and biotic stress.Plant molecular biology · 2016Article
- Dynamic transcriptome analysis and volatile profiling of Gossypium hirsutum in response to the cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Analysis of plant leaf metabolites reveals no common response to insect herbivory by Pieris rapae in three related host-plant species.Journal of experimental botany · 2015Article
- Plant defence responses in oilseed rape MINELESS plants after attack by the cabbage moth Mamestra brassicae.Journal of experimental botany · 2015Article
- Development and characterization of low α-linolenic acid Brassica oleracea lines bearing a novel mutation in a 'class a' FATTY ACID DESATURASE 3 gene.BMC genetics · 2014Article
- Variation in plant responsiveness to defense elicitors caused by genotype and environment.Frontiers in plant science · 2014Article
- Comparative transcriptome analysis of Gossypium hirsutum L. in response to sap sucking insects: aphid and whitefly.BMC genomics · 2013Article
- Plants know where it hurts: root and shoot jasmonic acid induction elicit differential responses in Brassica oleracea.PloS one · 2013Article
- Mechanisms of plant defense against insect herbivores.Plant signaling & behavior · 2012Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTranscriptional profiling after herbivore attack reveals, at the molecular level, how plants respond to this type of biotic stress. Comparing herbivore-induced transcriptional responses of plants with different phenotypes provides insight into plant defense mechanisms. Here, we compare the global gene expression patterns induced by Pieris rapae caterpillar attack in two white cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) cultivars. The two cultivars are shown to differ in their level of direct defense against caterpillar feeding. Because Brassica full genome microarrays are not yet available, 70-mer oligonucleotide microarrays based on the Arabidopsis thaliana genome were used for this non-model plant.
resultsThe transcriptional responses of the two cultivars differed in timing as characterized by changes in their expression pattern after 24, 48 and 72 hours of caterpillar feeding. In addition, they also differed qualitatively. Surprisingly, of all genes induced at any time point, only one third was induced in both cultivars. Analyses of transcriptional responses after jasmonate treatment revealed that the difference in timing did not hold for the response to this phytohormone. Additionally, comparisons between Pieris rapae- and jasmonate-induced transcriptional responses showed that Pieris rapae induced more jasmonate-independent than jasmonate-dependent genes.
conclusionThe present study clearly shows that global transcriptional responses in two cultivars of the same plant species in response to insect feeding can differ dramatically. Several of these differences involve genes that are known to have an impact on Pieris rapae performance and probably underlie different mechanisms of direct defense, present in the cultivars.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.