ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2007
In vitro susceptibilities of Mycoplasma putrefaciens field isolates.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular detection of antimicrobial resistance in livestock mycoplasmas: current status and future prospects.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Review
- Antibacterial potential of commercial and wild lactic acid bacteria strains isolated from ovine and caprine raw milk againstFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Resistance to 16-Membered Macrolides, Tiamulin and Lincomycin in a Swine Isolate ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Addressing the Antimicrobial Resistance of Ruminant Mycoplasmas Using a Clinical Surveillance Network.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Article
- Contagious Agalactia In Sheep And Goats: Current Perspectives.Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2019Review
- Antimicrobial susceptibility and multilocus sequence typing of Mycoplasma capricolum subsp. capricolum.PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MICs were determined for 15 antimicrobial agents against 37 Mycoplasma putrefaciens isolates. The most effective antimicrobial drug classes were the fluoroquinolones, the tetracyclines, the lincosamide lincomycin, and the macrolides. The susceptibility profile of the isolates correlated with the geographic origin. This is the first report of decreased susceptibility to the macrolides, lincomycin, and the tetracyclines in M. putrefaciens strains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.