Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17637833›Full record

ArticlePloS one2007

Modeling insertional mutagenesis using gene length and expression in murine embryonic stem cells.

Alex S Nord, Karen Vranizan, Whittemore Tingley, Alexander C Zambon, Kristina Hanspers, Loren G Fong, Yan Hu, Peter Bacchetti, Thomas E Ferrin, Patricia C Babbitt and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genome Wide Conditional Mouse Knockout Resources.Drug discovery today. Disease models · 2016
    Article
  3. Beyond knockouts: the International Knockout Mouse Consortium delivers modular and evolving tools for investigating mammalian genes.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2015
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Alex S NordDepartment of Medicine, MacDonald Medical Research Laboratories, University of California at Los Angeles, California, USA. nordalex@u.washington.edu
Karen Vranizan
Whittemore Tingley
Alexander C Zambon
Kristina Hanspers
Loren G Fong
Yan Hu
Peter Bacchetti
Thomas E Ferrin
Patricia C Babbitt
Scott W Doniger
William C Skarnes
Stephen G Young
Bruce R Conklin
University of California, San Francisco · USGladstone Institutes · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USLos Angeles Medical Center · USWellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

THE NHLBI BAY AREA FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS CONSORTIUMU01HL066621 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI YOUNG, STEPHEN G · 2000 to 2007
$12.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG002766NHLBI NIH HHS HL66621NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL066621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-throughput mutagenesis of the mammalian genome is a powerful means to facilitate analysis of gene function. Gene trapping in embryonic stem cells (ESCs) is the most widely used form of insertional mutagenesis in mammals. However, the rules governing its efficiency are not fully understood, and the effects of vector design on the likelihood of gene-trapping events have not been tested on a genome-wide scale. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsIn this study, we used public gene-trap data to model gene-trap likelihood. Using the association of gene length and gene expression with gene-trap likelihood, we constructed spline-based regression models that characterize which genes are susceptible and which genes are resistant to gene-trapping techniques. We report results for three classes of gene-trap vectors, showing that both length and expression are significant determinants of trap likelihood for all vectors. Using our models, we also quantitatively identified hotspots of gene-trap activity, which represent loci where the high likelihood of vector insertion is controlled by factors other than length and expression. These formalized statistical models describe a high proportion of the variance in the likelihood of a gene being trapped by expression-dependent vectors and a lower, but still significant, proportion of the variance for vectors that are predicted to be independent of endogenous gene expression. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The findings of significant expression and length effects reported here further the understanding of the determinants of vector insertion. Results from this analysis can be applied to help identify other important determinants of this important biological phenomenon and could assist planning of large-scale mutagenesis efforts.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionModels, GeneticMutagenesis, InsertionalAnimalsChromosome MappingEmbryonic Stem CellsExonsGenetic VectorsGenomeLikelihood FunctionsMiceOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPlasmidsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction

Identifiers

PMID17637833
PMCPMC1910612
OpenAlexW2030146704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.