SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007
Family therapy for depression.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ranking psychological interventions for post-stroke depression: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Psychological medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Next of kin involvement in mental health care services - a systematic participatory overview of evidence syntheses.BMC psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Cognitive behavioural therapy and third-wave approaches for anxiety and related disorders in older people.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Effectiveness of family-based therapy for depressive symptoms in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie · 2023Pooled it
- Family therapy for adolescents with depression and suicidal ideation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical child psychology and psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
- Effect of family-centered interventions for perinatal depression: an overview of systematic reviews.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
- Behavioural activation therapy for depression in adults with non-communicable diseases.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Behavioural activation therapy for depression in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Psychological therapies for children and adolescents exposed to trauma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Non-pharmacological interventions for depression in adults and children with traumatic brain injury.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Dance movement therapy for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- 'Third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies versus treatment as usual for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- 'Third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies versus other psychological therapies for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Behavioural therapies versus other psychological therapies for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Trial
- Family psychoeducation for major depressive disorder - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials · 2016Trial
- Trial
- Association between living arrangement and psychological well-being among patients with major depressive disorder: the moderating role of body mass index.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Advancements in Nanotherapeutics for the Treatment of Depression via Intranasal Pathway: A Review.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Self-management strategies and care needs of patients with persistent depressive disorder and their informal caregivers: a multi-perspectives qualitative interview study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeople with depression often experience interpersonal problems. Family therapy for depression is a widely used intervention, but it is unclear whether this is an effective therapy for the treatment of depression.
objectivesTo assess the efficacy of family therapy for depression. SEARCH STRATEGY: The following electronic databases were searched using a specific search strategy: CCDANCTR-Studies and CCDANCTR-References searched on 21/10/2005, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline (1966 to January 2005), EMBASE (1980 to January 2005), Psycinfo (1974 to January 2005). Reference lists of articles were also searched. Handsearches of relevant journals and bibliographies were conducted and first authors of included studies and experts in the field were contacted for further information. SELECTION CRITERIA: Included studies were randomised controlled and controlled clinical trials comparing family therapy with no intervention or an alternative intervention in which depression symptomatology was a main outcome measure. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Methodological quality was independently assessed by two review authors using the Maastricht-Amsterdam Criteria List. The qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the selected trials were independently extracted by three review authors using a standardised data extraction form. Levels of evidence were used to determine the strength of the evidence available. It was not possible to perform meta-analyses because of the heterogeneity of the selected studies. MAIN
resultsThree high-quality and three low-quality studies, involving 519 people with depression, were identified. The studies were very heterogeneous in terms of interventions, participants, and measuring instruments. Despite fairly good methodological quality and positive findings of some studies, evidence for the effectiveness of family therapy for depression did not exceed level 3 (limited or conflicting evidence), except for moderate evidence (level 2), based on the non-combined findings from three studies, indicating that family therapy is more effective than no treatment or waiting list condition on decreasing depression, and on increasing family functioning. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThe current evidence base is too heterogeneous and sparse to draw conclusions on the overall effectiveness of family therapy in the treatment of depression. At this point, use of psychological interventions for the treatment of depression for which there is already an evidence-base would seem to be preferable to family therapy. Further high quality trials examining the effectiveness and comparative effectiveness of explicitly defined forms of family therapy are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.