SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007
Anticoagulation for thrombosis prophylaxis in cancer patients with central venous catheters.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anticoagulation for people with cancer and central venous catheters.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- epic3: national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England.The Journal of hospital infection · 2014Guideline
- Systemic treatments for the prevention of venous thrombo-embolic events in paediatric cancer patients with tunnelled central venous catheters.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Interventions other than anticoagulants and systemic antibiotics for prevention of central venous catheter-related infections in children with cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Low-intensity adjusted-dose warfarin for the prevention of hemodialysis catheter failure: a randomized, controlled trial.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2011Trial
- Review
- Risk associated with central catheters for malignant tumor patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Oncotarget · 2018Article
- Venous thromboembolism in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.Bone marrow transplantation · 2016Review
- Primary prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolic events in patients with gastrointestinal cancers - Review.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2016Review
- Canadian consensus recommendations on the management of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. Part 1: prophylaxis.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2015Article
- Thrombosis and cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2012Review
- Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2011Article
- Playing games with a thrombus: a dangerous match. Paradoxical embolism from a huge central venous cathether thrombus: a case report.Cardiovascular ultrasound · 2010Article
- Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in cancer: a consensus statement of major guidelines panels and call to action.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCentral venous catheter (CVC) placement increases the risk of thrombosis in cancer patients. Thrombosis often necessitates the removal of the CVC, resulting in treatment delays and thrombosis related morbidity and mortality.
objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation in reducing venous thromboembolic (VTE) events in cancer patients with CVC. SEARCH STRATEGY: A comprehensive search for studies of anticoagulation in cancer patients up to January 2006 was conducted in the following databases: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials ( CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and ISI the Web of Science. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), vitamin K antagonists (VKA), fondaparinux or ximelagatran to no intervention or placebo in cancer patients with a CVC or comparing two different anticoagulants. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data was extracted on methodological quality, patients, interventions and outcomes including all cause mortality (primary outcome), premature CVC removal, catheter-related infections, CVC site and non CVC site deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), major and minor bleeding and thrombocytopenia. MAIN
resultsOf 3986 identified citations nine RCTs were included in the meta-analysis including one published as an abstract and one focusing on paediatric patients not included in the meta-analysis. None of these RCTs tested fondaparinux or ximelagatran. The use of heparin in cancer patients with CVC was associated with a trend towards a reduction in symptomatic DVT (Relative Risk (RR) = 0.43; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.18 to 1.06), but the data did not show any statistically significant effect on mortality (RR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.40 to 1.36), infection (RR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.36 to 2.28), major bleeding (RR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.10 to 4.78) or thrombocytopenia (RR = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.49 to 1.46). The effect warfarin on symptomatic DVT was not statistically significant (RR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.30 to 1.27). When studies assessing different types of anticoagulants were pooled, symptomatic DVT rates were significantly reduced (RR = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.92). AUTHORS'
conclusionsCancer patients with CVC considering anticoagulation, should consider the possible benefit of reduced incidence of thromboembolic complications with the burden and harms of anticoagulation. Future studies should be adequately powered and evaluate the effects of newer anticoagulants such as fondaparinux and ximelagatran in cancer patients with CVC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.