Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17636845›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007

Anticoagulation for thrombosis prophylaxis in cancer patients with central venous catheters.

E A Akl, G Karmath, V Yosuico, S Y Kim, M Barba, F Sperati, D Cook, H J Schünemann

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Anticoagulation for people with cancer and central venous catheters.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Thrombosis and cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2012
    Review
  12. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2011
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in cancer: a consensus statement of major guidelines panels and call to action.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

E A AklState University of New York at Buffalo, Medicine, ECMC, CC-142, 462 Girder Street, Buffalo, New York 14215, USA. elieakl@buffalo.edu
G Karmath
V Yosuico
S Y Kim
M Barba
F Sperati
D Cook
H J Schünemann
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USMcMaster University · CANational Cancer Institute · MYPhiladelphia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCentral venous catheter (CVC) placement increases the risk of thrombosis in cancer patients. Thrombosis often necessitates the removal of the CVC, resulting in treatment delays and thrombosis related morbidity and mortality.

objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation in reducing venous thromboembolic (VTE) events in cancer patients with CVC. SEARCH STRATEGY: A comprehensive search for studies of anticoagulation in cancer patients up to January 2006 was conducted in the following databases: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials ( CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and ISI the Web of Science. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), vitamin K antagonists (VKA), fondaparinux or ximelagatran to no intervention or placebo in cancer patients with a CVC or comparing two different anticoagulants. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data was extracted on methodological quality, patients, interventions and outcomes including all cause mortality (primary outcome), premature CVC removal, catheter-related infections, CVC site and non CVC site deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), major and minor bleeding and thrombocytopenia. MAIN

resultsOf 3986 identified citations nine RCTs were included in the meta-analysis including one published as an abstract and one focusing on paediatric patients not included in the meta-analysis. None of these RCTs tested fondaparinux or ximelagatran. The use of heparin in cancer patients with CVC was associated with a trend towards a reduction in symptomatic DVT (Relative Risk (RR) = 0.43; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.18 to 1.06), but the data did not show any statistically significant effect on mortality (RR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.40 to 1.36), infection (RR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.36 to 2.28), major bleeding (RR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.10 to 4.78) or thrombocytopenia (RR = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.49 to 1.46). The effect warfarin on symptomatic DVT was not statistically significant (RR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.30 to 1.27). When studies assessing different types of anticoagulants were pooled, symptomatic DVT rates were significantly reduced (RR = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.92). AUTHORS'

conclusionsCancer patients with CVC considering anticoagulation, should consider the possible benefit of reduced incidence of thromboembolic complications with the burden and harms of anticoagulation. Future studies should be adequately powered and evaluate the effects of newer anticoagulants such as fondaparinux and ximelagatran in cancer patients with CVC.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAnticoagulantsCatheterization, Central VenousHeparinHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVenous ThrombosisVitamin KAnticoagulantsHeparinHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightVitamin K

Identifiers

PMID17636845
OpenAlexW1920594391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.