Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17636839›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007

Sub-Tenon's anaesthesia versus topical anaesthesia for cataract surgery.

M Davison, S Padroni, C Bunce, H Rüschen

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Sub-Tenon's anaesthesia versus topical anaesthesia for cataract surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Interventions for age-related visual problems in patients with stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  4. Routine preoperative medical testing for cataract surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  5. Routine preoperative medical testing for cataract surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M DavisonMoorfields Eye Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia, 162 City Road, London, UK, EC1V2PD. marcdavison32@gmail.com
S Padroni
C Bunce
H Rüschen
Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLocal anaesthesia for cataract surgery can be provided by either sub-Tenon or topical anaesthesia. Although there is some work suggesting advantages to both techniques, there has been no recent systematic attempt to compare both techniques for all relevant outcomes.

objectivesTo compare the effectiveness of topical anaesthesia (with or without the addition of intracameral local anaesthetic) and sub-Tenon's anaesthesia in providing pain relief during cataract surgery. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, 2006, Issue 2); MEDLINE (1990 to July 2006); EMBASE (1990 to July 2006) and reference lists of articles. There were no constraints based on language or publication status. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomized or quasi-randomized studies comparing sub-Tenon anaesthesia with topical anaesthesia for cataract surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. We also collected adverse effects information from the trials. MAIN

resultsSeven studies involving 617 patients with 742 eyes operated on were examined. Five studies used unpaired data, with a single eye operated on; two studies used paired data with both eyes operated on. The surgical technique was clear corneal incision in five studies and scleral tunnel in two. The overall quality of the studies was not high, with one study triple blind (patient, surgeon and assessor blinded to treatment group) and three others single blind. The allocation of concealment and methods of randomization were only described in two studies. Three unpaired studies showed that sub-Tenon anaesthesia provided better intra-operative pain relief than topical anaesthesia (pooled weighted mean difference (fixed) 1.28, 95% CI 0.83to 1.72). The differences in the pain scores are not necessarily clinically significant although statistically significant. The differences are not large in magnitude and are skewed to the low end of the visual analogue scale but the studies are consistent throughout in reporting more pain in the topical anaesthesia group. This was also supported by the one paired study which showed that the mean pain score in the topical group was 1.13 (SD 1.57) compared with 0.57 (SD 1.28) in the sub-Tenon group (P < 0.001). Three of the studies used a 10-point visual analogue scale, while one used a novel 5-point scale. Further support was provided by other outcome measures. Sub-Tenon anaesthesia caused more chemosis and sub-conjunctival haemorrhage although this was purely aesthetic. The more serious complication of posterior capsule tear and vitreous loss occurred twice as much in the topical group than with sub-Tenon anaesthesia (4.3% versus 2.1%). AUTHORS'

conclusionsSub-Tenon anaesthesia provides better pain relief than topical anaesthesia for cataract surgery.

Indexed as

Cataract ExtractionAdultAnesthesia, LocalAnesthetics, LocalHumansNerve BlockPainPain MeasurementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnesthetics, Local

Identifiers

PMID17636839
OpenAlexW1946533893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.