SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007
Manual material handling advice and assistive devices for preventing and treating back pain in workers.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-pharmacological and non-surgical treatments for low back pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Manual material handling advice and assistive devices for preventing and treating back pain in workers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- Occupational safety and health interventions to reduce musculoskeletal symptoms in the health care sector.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2010Pooled it
- Effect of training and lifting equipment for preventing back pain in lifting and handling: systematic review.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2008Pooled it
- Effectiveness of workplace interventions in rehabilitating musculoskeletal disorders and preventing its consequences among workers with physical and sedentary employment: systematic review protocol.Systematic reviews · 2019Article
- An Evidence-Based Multidisciplinary Practice Guideline to Reduce the Workload due to Lifting for Preventing Work-Related Low Back Pain.Annals of occupational and environmental medicine · 2014Review
- Essential Occupational Safety and Health Interventions for Low- and Middle-income Countries: An Overview of the Evidence.Safety and health at work · 2013Article
- Relationship of sleep deficiency to perceived pain and functional limitations in hospital patient care workers.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2012Article
- Disability management outcomes in the Ontario long-term care sector.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2010Article
- Informing your practice with reviews published by the cochrane back review group: conservative interventions for neck and back pain.Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2010Article
- Back disorders and lumbar load in nursing staff in geriatric care: a comparison of home-based care and nursing homes.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2009Article
- Occupational injuries.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraining and assistive devices are considered major interventions to prevent back pain among workers exposed to manual material handling (MMH).
objectivesTo determine the effectiveness of MMH advice and training and the provision of assistive devices in preventing and treating back pain. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE to November 2005, EMBASE to August 2005, and CENTRAL, the Back Group's Trials Register, CINAHL, Nioshtic, CISdoc, Science Citation Index, and PsychLIT to September 2005. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCT) and cohort studies with a concurrent control group, aimed at changing human behaviour in MMH and measuring back pain, back pain-related disability or sickness absence. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently extracted the data and assessed the methodological quality using the criteria recommended by the Back Review Group for RCTs and MINORS for the cohort studies. One author of an original study supplied additional data for the review. The results and conclusions are based on the primary analysis of RCTs. We conducted a secondary analysis with cohort studies. We compared and contrasted the conclusions from the primary and secondary analyses. MAIN
resultsWe included six RCTs (17,720 employees) and five cohort studies (772 employees). All studies focused on prevention of back pain. Two RCTs and all cohort studies met the majority of the quality criteria and were labeled high quality. We summarized the strength of the evidence with a qualitative analysis since the lack of data precluded a statistical analysis. There is moderate evidence that MMH advice and training are no more effective at preventing back pain or back pain-related disability than no intervention (four studies) or minor advice (one study). There is limited evidence that MMH advice and training are no more effective than physical exercise or back belt use in preventing back pain (three studies), and that MMH advice plus assistive devices are not more effective than MMH advice alone (one study) or no intervention (one study) in preventing back pain or related disability. The results of the cohort studies were similar to the randomised studies. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is limited to moderate evidence that MMH advice and training with or without assistive devices do not prevent back pain, back pain-related disability or reduce sick leave when compared to no intervention or alternative interventions. There is no evidence available for the effectiveness of MMH advice and training or MMH assistive devices for treating back pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.