Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17636802›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007

Sildenafil for pulmonary hypertension in neonates.

P S Shah, A Ohlsson

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sildenafil for pulmonary hypertension in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Milrinone for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Novel treatments for NEC: keeping IBD in mind.Current gastroenterology reports · 2012
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Bringing down the ROS: a new therapeutic approach for PPHN.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2008
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P S ShahUniversity of Toronto, Department of Paediatrics, Rm 775A, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1XB. pshah@mtsinai.on.ca
A Ohlsson
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersistent pulmonary hypertension in neonates (PPHN) is associated with high mortality. Currently, the therapeutic mainstay for PPHN is assisted ventilation and administration of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO). However, nitric oxide is costly and may not be appropriate in resource-poor settings. Approximately 30% of patients fail to respond to iNO. High concentrations of phosphodiesterases in the pulmonary vasculature has led to the use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors such as sildenafil or milrinone.

objectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of Sildenafil in the treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension in neonates. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL databases were searched from their inception until March 2007; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Library, the reference lists of identified trials, and abstracts of meetings were searched without any language restriction. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials of Sildenafil compared with placebo or other pulmonary vasodilators, irrespective of dose, route and duration of administration in neonates with PPHN, were included if the trial reported any of the pre-specified outcomes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The methodological quality of the trials was assessed regarding how bias at study entry, study intervention and outcomes measurement was minimized. Data on relevant outcomes were extracted and the effect size was estimated and reported as relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD) and weighted mean difference (MD) as appropriate. The I-squared (I(2)) test of heterogeneity was applied. MAIN

resultsTwo small eligible trials (one full article and one abstract) were identified. The methodological quality of the trial presented in the full article was good. Information provided in the abstract was limited. The total number of enrolled patients in the two studies was 37. Both studies were performed in resource-limited settings where iNO and high frequency ventilation are not available. Both studies reported statistically significant improvement in oxygenation (reduction in oxygenation index) in the Sildenafil group. One study reported what would be, if replicated, a strongly protective effect on mortality (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03, 1.09) favoring the Sildenafil group. However, this result needs to be replicated in larger studies. No clinically important side effects were reported. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThe safety and effectiveness of sildenafil in the treatment of PPHN has not yet been established and its use should be restricted within the context of randomized controlled trials. Further randomized controlled trials of adequate power comparing Sildenafil with other pulmonary vasodilators are needed in moderately ill infants with PPHN.

Indexed as

HumansHypertension, PulmonaryInfant, NewbornPiperazinesPurinesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSildenafil CitrateSulfonesVasodilator AgentsPiperazinesPurinesSildenafil CitrateSulfonesVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID17636802
OpenAlexW4214563170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.