SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007
Chinese medicinal herbs for sore throat.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes reported in randomized controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine for acute pharyngitis: a scoping review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Chinese medicinal herbs for sore throat.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Yuye Jinhua Qingre Tablets Attenuate Acute Pharyngitis by inhibiting the Complement Cascade and C5a/C5aR1 Axis.Chinese medicine · 2025Article
- Natural Compounds for Preventing Ear, Nose, and Throat-Related Oral Infections.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Effect of VBC-1814/7J, a poly-phytocompound, on a non-infectious model of pharyngitis.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2017Article
- Environmental and non-infectious factors in the aetiology of pharyngitis (sore throat).Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2012Review
- Reducing uncertainty in managing respiratory tract infections in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010Article
- Article
- Evidence from the Cochrane Collaboration for Traditional Chinese Medicine therapies.Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) · 2009Review
- Traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of acute respiratory tract infections.Respiratory medicine · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChinese herbal medicines are commonly used to treat sore throat in China and among Chinese people worldwide. Their efficacy in treating sore throat has not previously been systematically reviewed.
objectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicines for patients with sore throat. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2006) which contains the Acute Respiratory Infections Group's specialised register; MEDLINE (1966 to August 2006); EMBASE (1980 to August 2006); AMED (1985 to August 2006); the Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) (1975 to August 2006), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) (1994 to August 2006). SELECTION CRITERIA: We only included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing Chinese herbal medicines for the treatment of sore throat with the outcomes of recovery, inefficacy, and adverse events. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One review author contacted the trial authors of claimed RCTs. Three review authors extracted and analysed the data. MAIN
resultsSeven trials involving 1253 participants were included. All trials were identified as being of methodologically poor quality (C category). All of the Chinese herbal preparations in this review were inadequately characterised and were assessed in one trial only. It is highly likely that there was selection bias or detection bias, or both, in all of the included trials. Conflict of interest may have been another factor in producing a positive result in three studies as the prepared drugs were made in the trial author's hospital. We did not perform a meta-analysis and the results of the studies are reported separately. Three formulations were shown to be superior to the control in improving recovery: Ertong Qingyan Jiere Koufuye was more effective than Fufang Shuanghua Koufuye for acute pharyngitis (OR 1.54, 95% Cl 1.11 to 5.74); Yanhouling mixture was more effective than the gentamicin atomised inhalation for acute pharyngitis (OR 5.39, 95% CI 2.69 to 10.81) for acute pharyngitis; and Qinganlan Liyan Hanpian was more effective than Fufang Caoshanhu Hanpian for chronic pharyngitis (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.67). Four four formulations were shown to be equal in efficacy to the control. AUTHORS'
conclusionsBased on the existing evidence included in this review, the efficacy of Chinese herbal medicine for treating sore throat is controversial and questionable. We cannot recommend any kind of Chinese medical herbal formulation as an effective remedy for sore throat, due to the lack of high quality clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.