SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007
Parasympathomimetic drugs for the treatment of salivary gland dysfunction due to radiotherapy.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions for the management of dry mouth: non-pharmacological interventions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Interventions for the management of dry mouth: topical therapies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- Radiation-induced xerostomia and cariogenic dietary habits.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- Sarcopenic Dysphagia, Malnutrition, and Oral Frailty in Elderly: A Comprehensive Review.Nutrients · 2022Review
- A randomised controlled pilot trial of two interventions to manage dry mouth in pre-operative elective surgical patients.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2020Article
- Prevalence of Xerostomia in Patients Referred to Shiraz Dental School, Shiraz, Iran during 2006-2013.Iranian journal of public health · 2016Article
- Using mid infrared technology as new method for the determination of the dwell time of salivary substitutes on three dimensional gingiva models.BMC ear, nose, and throat disorders · 2016Article
- Article
- Do pilocarpine drops help dry mouth in palliative care patients: a protocol for an aggregated series of n-of-1 trials.BMC palliative care · 2013Article
- Cost-effectiveness landscape analysis of treatments addressing xerostomia in patients receiving head and neck radiation therapy.Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology · 2013Review
- The effects of antidepressants and pilocarpine on rat parotid glands: an immunohistochemical study.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2011Article
- Review
- Seeking Optimal Management for Radioactive Iodine Therapy-induced Adverse Effects.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursingReview
- Evaluation of the oral component of Sjögren's syndrome: An overview.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryReview
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSalivary gland dysfunction is a predictable side effect of radiotherapy to the head and neck region. Pilocarpine hydrochloride (a choline ester) is licensed in many countries for the treatment of radiation-induced salivary gland dysfunction. Other parasympathomimetics have also been used 'off licence' in the treatment of this condition.
objectivesTo determine the efficacy and tolerability of parasympathomimetic drugs in the treatment of radiation-induced salivary gland dysfunction. SEARCH STRATEGY: A detailed search strategy was developed for MEDLINE, and adapted for other databases (Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Group Register; Cochrane Oral Health Group Register; The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register; EMBASE; CINAHL; SIGLE; Dissertation Abstracts). The reference lists of identified studies, review articles and radiotherapy textbooks were checked for additional studies. Relevant pharmaceutical companies, clinical investigators, and professional organizations/journals were also contacted about additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: The selection criteria for the review were: 1) randomised controlled trials; 2) patients suffering from radiation-induced salivary gland dysfunction; 3) patients treated with parasympathomimetic drugs; and 4) assessable data available on primary outcome measures. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The two review authors independently collected data from the full text version of relevant papers including: 1) citation details; 2) patients; 3) interventions; 4) assessments; 5) outcomes (i.e. efficacy, tolerability); and 6) quality issues. We were unable to perform a meta-analysis, due to a lack of appropriate data. MAIN
resultsOnly three studies, involving a total of 298 patients, fulfilled the entry criteria for the review. All three studies involved the use of pilocarpine hydrochloride. The data suggest that pilocarpine hydrochloride was more effective than placebo, and at least as effective as artificial saliva in those participants that responded. The response rate was 42 to 51%. The time to response was up to 12 weeks. The side effect rate was high, and side effects were the main reason for withdrawal (six to 15% patients taking 5 mg tds). The side effects were usually the result of generalised parasympathomimetic stimulation (e.g. sweating, headaches, urinary frequency, vasodilatation). Response rates were not dose dependent, but side effect rates were dose dependent. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is limited evidence to support the use of pilocarpine hydrochloride in the treatment of radiation-induced salivary gland dysfunction. Currently, there is little evidence to support the use of other parasympathomimetic drugs in the treatment of this condition. Available studies suggest approximately half of patients will respond, but side effects to responders can be problematic. Adverse effects are dose dependent therefore it is important to keep dose to 5 mg tds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.