Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17636733›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007

Continuous support for women during childbirth.

E D Hodnett, S Gates, G J Hofmeyr, C Sakala

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06024811 (Investigation of the Effect of Supporting Nursing Care Provided in Line With Evidence-Based Practices During Intrapartum Period), which is not on this map. Cited by 55 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06024811 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Investigation of the Effect of Supporting Nursing Care Provided in Line With Evidence-Based Practices During Intrapartum Period

TypeobservationalSponsorBalikesir UniversityRan2020 to 2021Enrolled1ConditionsDelivery, Breech, StillbirthArmssupporting nursing care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 275 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Continuous support for women during childbirth.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  4. Parenteral opioids for maternal pain relief in labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Immersion in water in labour and birth.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009
    Pooled it
  7. Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E D HodnettUniversity of Toronto, Faculty of Nursing, 155 College Street, Suite 130, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 1P8. ellen.hodnett@utoronto.ca
S Gates
G J Hofmeyr
C Sakala
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHistorically, women have been attended and supported by other women during labour. However, in recent decades in hospitals worldwide, continuous support during labour has become the exception rather than the routine. Concerns about the consequent dehumanization of women's birth experiences have led to calls for a return to continuous support by women for women during labour.

objectivesPrimary: to assess the effects, on mothers and their babies, of continuous, one-to-one intrapartum support compared with usual care. Secondary: to determine whether the effects of continuous support are influenced by: (1) routine practices and policies in the birth environment that may affect a woman's autonomy, freedom of movement and ability to cope with labour; (2) whether the caregiver is a member of the staff of the institution; and (3) whether the continuous support begins early or later in labour. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (February 2007). SELECTION CRITERIA: All published and unpublished randomized controlled trials comparing continuous support during labour with usual care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration Pregnancy and Childbirth Group. All authors participated in evaluation of methodological quality. One author and a research assistant independently extracted the data. We sought additional information from the trial authors. We used relative risk for categorical data and weighted mean difference for continuous data to present the results. MAIN

resultsSixteen trials involving 13,391 women met inclusion criteria and provided usable outcome data. Primary comparison: women who had continuous intrapartum support were likely to have a slightly shorter labour, were more likely to have a spontaneous vaginal birth and less likely to have intrapartum analgesia or to report dissatisfaction with their childbirth experiences. Subgroup analyses: in general, continuous intrapartum support was associated with greater benefits when the provider was not a member of the hospital staff, when it began early in labour and in settings in which epidural analgesia was not routinely available. AUTHORS'

conclusionsAll women should have support throughout labour and birth.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricLabor, ObstetricFemaleHumansMidwiferyObstetric NursingPerinatal CarePregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID17636733
OpenAlexW4246114185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.