SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007
Electrical stimulation for faecal incontinence in adults.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- Plugs for containing faecal incontinence.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Electrical stimulation and biofeedback for the treatment of fecal incontinence: a systematic review.International journal of colorectal disease · 2013Pooled it
- Perianal injectable bulking agents as treatment for faecal incontinence in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Biofeedback and/or sphincter exercises for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Triple-target treatment versus low-frequency electrostimulation for anal incontinence: a randomized, controlled trial.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2011Trial
- The Japan Society of Coloproctology Practice Guidelines for Fecal Incontinence 2024 (Revised Second Edition).Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2026Review
- Pelvic Floor Disorders Due to Anal Sexual Activity in Men and Women: A Narrative Review.Archives of sexual behavior · 2024Review
- Rapid priority setting exercise on faecal incontinence for Cochrane Incontinence.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Cervical Cancer. Guideline of the DGGG, DKG and DKH (S3-Level, AWMF Registry No. 032/033OL, May 2021) - Part 2 with Recommendations on Psycho-oncology, Rehabilitation, Follow-up, Recurrence, Palliative Therapy and Healthcare Facilities.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2022Article
- Pelvic floor physical therapy in the treatment of chronic anal fissure (PAF-study): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2021Article
- Kegel Exercises, Biofeedback, Electrostimulation, and Peripheral Neuromodulation Improve Clinical Symptoms of Fecal Incontinence and Affect Specific Physiological Targets: An Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2021Article
- Japanese Practice Guidelines for Fecal Incontinence Part 2-Examination and Conservative Treatment for Fecal Incontinence- English Version.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2021Review
- Dutch evidence statement for pelvic physical therapy in patients with anal incontinence.International urogynecology journal · 2015Review
- Current management of fecal incontinence.The Permanente journal · 2013Review
- Mesenchymal stem cells can improve anal pressures after anal sphincter injury.Stem cell research · 2013Article
- Low current electrical stimulation upregulates cytokine expression in the anal sphincter.International journal of colorectal disease · 2012Article
- Alternative approaches to the treatment of fecal incontinence.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2011Article
- Fecal incontinence: part 4 of a series of articles on incontinence.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFaecal incontinence is a particularly embarrassing and distressing condition with significant medical, social and economic implications. Electrical stimulation has been used with apparent success in the treatment of faecal incontinence. However, standards of treatment are still lacking and the magnitude of alleged benefits has yet to be established.
objectivesTo determine the effects of electrical stimulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Trials Register (searched 13 March 2007) and reference lists of potentially eligible articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or quasi-randomised trials evaluating electrical stimulation in adults with faecal incontinence. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers assessed the methodological quality of potentially eligible trials and independently extracted data from the included trials. A wide range of outcome measures were considered. MAIN
resultsFour eligible trials with 260 participants were identified. Findings from one trial suggest that electrical stimulation with anal biofeedback and exercises provides more short-term benefits than vaginal biofeedback and exercises for women with obstetric-related faecal incontinence. Another study found contradictory results, with no added benefit from electrical stimulation over biofeedback and exercises alone. Although all trials report that patient's symptoms are generally improved, it is not clear that this is the effect of electrical stimulation. No further conclusions could be drawn from the data available. AUTHORS'
conclusionsAt present, there are insufficient data to allow reliable conclusions to be drawn on the effects of electrical stimulation in the management of faecal incontinence. There is a suggestion that electrical stimulation may have a therapeutic effect, but this is not certain. Larger, more generalisable trials are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.