Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17636417›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2007

Timing of blood extraction in epidemiologic and proteomic studies: results and proposals from the PANKRAS II Study.

Miquel Porta, José Pumarega, Olga Ferrer-Armengou, Tomàs López, Joan Alguacil, Núria Malats, Esteve Fernàndez, PANKRAS II Study Group

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Rotterdam Study: 2010 objectives and design update.European journal of epidemiology · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Miquel PortaClinical & Molecular Epidemiology of Cancer Unit, Institut Municipal d'Investigació Mèdica, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Carrer del Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. mporta@imim.es
José Pumarega
Olga Ferrer-Armengou
Tomàs López
Joan Alguacil
Núria Malats
Esteve Fernàndez
PANKRAS II Study Group
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública · ESInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESUniversidad de Huelva · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are no consensus guidelines or standards for epidemiologic and '-omics' studies using blood biomarkers on how to report the timing of extraction of blood samples. However, disease-induced changes in blood concentrations of exogenous and endogenous compounds may bias studies. The aim of the present report is to describe the timing of blood collection with respect to a variety of relevant clinical events in the PANKRAS II Study, and to suggest ways to display graphically the quantitative information. Subjects were 167 incident cases of exocrine pancreatic cancer prospectively recruited in five teaching hospitals in eastern Spain. Over 80% of patients had blood extracted during the first 6 months since onset of cancer symptoms, and 82% within the first month of admission to a study hospital. Over 80% of cases had blood drawn after an ultrasound, a CT scan or an ERCP, 25% after a laparotomy, and 37% after treatment onset. All three intervals from blood extraction to diagnosis, to treatment onset and to interview had a median of 0 days, and 88% of cases had blood drawn within 2 weeks of diagnosis. Over 72% of cases had concentrations of total lipids in the medium, normal range. Results suggest ways to report intervals involving blood biomarkers and may contribute to develop consensus guidelines and standards on the collection of blood samples in epidemiologic and '-omics' research.

Indexed as

Epidemiologic MethodsEpidemiologic StudiesAgedAged, 80 and overBiomedical ResearchBlood Specimen CollectionFemaleGenomicsHumansLipidsMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic NeoplasmsSpainTime FactorsLipids

Identifiers

PMID17636417
OpenAlexW2003562472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.