Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17632735›Full record

ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2008

[Practicability of a German version of the "Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire". A questionnaire to assess disability caused by back pain].

C Gaul, E Mette, T Schmidt, S Grond

Abstract readComparative StudyEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Multidimensional long-term outcome analysis after single-level lumbar microdiscectomy: a retrospective single-centre study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

C GaulNeurologische Klinik mit Poliklinik, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Strasse 40, 06097, Halle, Deutschland. Charly.Gaul@gmx.de
E Mette
T Schmidt
S Grond
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEBG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle · DEMartha-Maria Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While caring for patients with chronic low back pain, a standardized measurement of pain and pain-related reduction of the quality of life is needed. Easy application and data collection are decisive for routine use. The Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire is an internationally widely used instrument, which was now scrutinized in 148 patients in two orthopedic hospitals. A higher pain disability was related to age, female gender, limitations experienced in social life, impact of pain, use of analgetics, low net income, and patients in Eastern Germany. The available German version of the questionnaire is suitable for daily use to measure the intensity of pain and pain-related disability in everyday life, including social impairment due to low back pain.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationSurveys and QuestionnairesActivities of Daily LivingAdultAgedAge FactorsCombined Modality TherapyCross-Cultural ComparisonFemaleGermanyHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedOrthopedicsOutpatient Clinics, Hospital

Identifiers

PMID17632735
OpenAlexW1891071245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.