Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17632524›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2007

Molecular breeding of polymerases for amplification of ancient DNA.

Marc d'Abbadie, Michael Hofreiter, Alexandra Vaisman, David Loakes, Didier Gasparutto, Jean Cadet, Roger Woodgate, Svante Pääbo, Philipp Holliger

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Engineering Polymerases for New Functions.Trends in biotechnology · 2019
    Review
  10. Synthetic evolution.Nature biotechnology · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Human evolution: a tale from ancient genomes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Methods for the directed evolution of proteins.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2015
    Review
  20. Reconstructing ancient genomes and epigenomes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Marc d'AbbadieMedical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QH, UK.
Michael Hofreiter
Alexandra Vaisman
David Loakes
Didier Gasparutto
Jean Cadet
Roger Woodgate
Svante Pääbo
Philipp Holliger
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology · DEMedical Research Council · GBNational Institutes of Health · USCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GBUniversité Joseph Fourier · FR

Funding

DNA Replication, Repair, and Mutagenesis In Eukaryotic And Prokaryotic CellsZIAHD001500 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI WOODGATE, ROGER · 2009 to 2025
$37.5M
DNA REPLICATION, REPAIR, AND MUTAGENESIS IN EUKARYOTIC AND PROKARYOTIC CELLSZ01HD001500 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI WOODGATE, ROGER · 1985 to 2008
$3.1M
Intramural NIH HHSMedical Research Council MC_U105178804Medical Research Council U.1051.03.006(78804)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the absence of repair, lesions accumulate in DNA. Thus, DNA persisting in specimens of paleontological, archaeological or forensic interest is inevitably damaged. We describe a strategy for the recovery of genetic information from damaged DNA. By molecular breeding of polymerase genes from the genus Thermus (Taq (Thermus aquaticus), Tth (Thermus thermophilus) and Tfl (Thermus flavus)) and compartmentalized self-replication selection, we have evolved polymerases that can extend single, double and even quadruple mismatches, process non-canonical primer-template duplexes and bypass lesions found in ancient DNA, such as hydantoins and abasic sites. Applied to the PCR amplification of 47,000-60,000-year-old cave bear DNA, these outperformed Taq DNA polymerase by up to 150% and yielded amplification products at sample dilutions at which Taq did not. Our results demonstrate that engineered polymerases can expand the recovery of genetic information from Pleistocene specimens and may benefit genetic analysis in paleontology, archeology and forensic medicine.

Indexed as

DNADNA DamageDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA FingerprintingForensic GeneticsFossilsPolymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNASpecimen HandlingDNADNA-Directed DNA Polymerase

Identifiers

PMID17632524
PMCPMC1978225
OpenAlexW2050247825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.