Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17631923›Full record

ArticleNeuropharmacology2007

Gene targeting demonstrates that alpha4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunits contribute to expression of diverse [3H]epibatidine binding sites and components of biphasic 86Rb+ efflux with high and low sensitivity to stimulation by acetylcholine.

Michael J Marks, Natalie M Meinerz, John Drago, Allan C Collins

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Reduced α4 subunit expression in α4British journal of pharmacology · 2018
    Article
  6. Stoichiometry of the Heteromeric Nicotinic Receptors of the Renshaw Cell.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  7. The (Molecular pharmacology · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Unraveling the high- and low-sensitivity agonist responses of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael J MarksInstitute for Behavioral Genetics, 447 UCB, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA. marksm@colorado.edu
Natalie M Meinerz
John Drago
Allan C Collins
University of Colorado Boulder · USUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

GENETICS OF NICOTINE TOLERANCE: ROLE OF RECEPTORSR01DA003194 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI MARKS, MICHAEL J · 1985 to 2013
$5.5M
Studies with Nicotinic Null Mutant MiceP30DA015663 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI MARKS, MICHAEL J · 2003 to 2013
$4.5M
NIDA NIH HHS DA03194NIDA NIH HHS DA15663NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA015663NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA003194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[3H]Epibatidine binds to nAChR subtypes in mouse brain with higher (KD approximately 0.02 nM) and lower affinity (KD approximately 7 nM), which can be further subdivided through inhibition by selected agonists and antagonists. These subsets are differentially affected by targeted deletion of alpha7, beta2 or beta4 subunits. Most, but not all, higher and lower affinity binding sites require beta2 (Marks, M.J., Whiteaker, P., Collins, A.C., 2006. Deletion of the alpha7, beta2 or beta4 nicotinic receptor subunit genes identifies highly expressed subtypes with relatively low affinity for [3H]epibatidine. Mol. Pharmacol. 70, 947-959). Effects of functional alpha4 gene deletion are reported here. Deletion of alpha4 virtually eliminated cytisine-sensitive, higher-affinity [3H]epibatidine binding as did beta2 deletion, confirming that these sites are alpha4beta2*-nAChR. Cytisine-resistant, higher-affinity [3H]epibatidine binding sites are diverse and some of these sites require alpha4 expression. Lower affinity [3H]epibatidine binding sites are also heterogeneous and can be subdivided into alpha-bungarotoxin-sensitive and -resistant components. Deleting alpha4 did not affect the alpha-bungarotoxin-sensitive component, but markedly reduced the alpha-bungarotoxin-resistant component. This effect was similar, but not quite identical, to the effect of beta2 deletion. This provides the first evidence that lower-affinity epibatidine binding sites in the brain require expression of alpha4 subunits. The effects of alpha4 gene targeting on receptor function were measured using a 86Rb+ efflux assay. Concentration-effect curves for ACh-stimulated 86Rb+ efflux are biphasic (EC50 values=3.3 microM and 300 microM). Targeting alpha4 produced substantial gene-dose dependent reductions in both phases in whole brain and in most of the 14 brain regions assayed. These effects are very similar to those following deletion of beta2. Thus, alpha4beta2*-nAChRs mediate a significant fraction of both phases of ACh stimulated 86Rb+ efflux.

Indexed as

AcetylcholineAlkaloidsAnimalsAzocinesBinding SitesBrainBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicBungarotoxinsCholinergic AgentsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug InteractionsGene TargetingMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutProtein SubunitsAcetylcholineAlkaloidsAzocinesBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicBungarotoxinsCholinergic AgentscytisineepibatidineProtein SubunitsPyridinesQuinolizidine AlkaloidsQuinolizinesReceptors, NicotinicRubidiumRubidium Radioisotopes

Identifiers

PMID17631923
PMCPMC2577786
OpenAlexW2033160725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.