Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17630818›Full record

ReviewCNS drugs2007

CNS aspergillosis: recognition, diagnosis and management.

Markus Ruhnke, Grzegorz Kofla, Kirsten Otto, Stefan Schwartz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drugs, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Infections in the immunocompromised child.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2018
    Review
  12. Fungal infections in pediatric neurosurgery.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Markus RuhnkeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Charité Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany. markus.ruhnke@charite.de
Grzegorz Kofla
Kirsten Otto
Stefan Schwartz
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early diagnosis of CNS aspergillosis requires a high degree of clinical suspicion, because there are no typical clinical symptoms or CSF findings. Clinical features are usually dramatic and tend to progress rapidly. Changes in mental status, hemiparesis and seizures are most common, but other nonspecific neurological features may occur and should always be an indication for neuroradiological examination in high-risk patients, in order to allow early initiation of antifungal therapy. Low density lesions with little or no mass effect and minimal or no contrast enhancement on CT scans that are usually more numerous on MRI and show intermediate signal intensity within high-signal areas on T2-weighted images, may suggest CNS aspergillosis. Cerebral lesions in CNS aspergillosis are often located not only in the cerebral hemispheres but also in the basal ganglia, thalami, corpus callosum and perforator artery territories. There is frequently a lack of contrast enhancement or perifocal oedema, due to the immunosuppressed status of the patient. A definite diagnosis requires brain tissue for histopathological analysis. However, neurosurgery is often not feasible, so that any of the neuroradiological findings mentioned above should raise the suspicion of CNS aspergillosis in immunocompromised patients and lead to early initiation of antifungal therapy. In the past, amphotericin B-based therapy was the treatment of choice for CNS aspergillosis, but this treatment produced negligible effects. Recently, voriconazole has been reported to be more effective than amphotericin B in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis. Response rates of about 35% have been achieved with voriconazole in patients with CNS aspergillosis. Combination therapy with antifungal agents, such as voriconazole plus caspofungin or liposomal amphotericin B, is being investigated in vitro and in animal models, and optimistic results have been observed. A combined medical and neurosurgical treatment should be considered in all patients with this disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntifungal AgentsDisease Models, AnimalHumansNeuroaspergillosisAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID17630818
OpenAlexW2029707725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.