Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17630337›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology reviews2007

Current status of veterinary vaccines.

Els N T Meeusen, John Walker, Andrew Peters, Paul-Pierre Pastoret, Gregers Jungersen

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 166 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
166citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

166 citing papers in PubMed, 507 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Thermostabilization of Vaccines by Cryopreservation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Detection of ongoing asymptomaticFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  13. Sexual selection and pseudogenization in primate fertilization.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Use of a slow-release GnRH implant in an adult billy goat.Tierarztliche Praxis. Ausgabe G, Grosstiere/Nutztiere · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

106 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Els N T MeeusenAnimal Biotechnology Research Laboratories, Department of Physiology, Building 13f, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia. els.meeusen@med.monash.edu.au
John Walker
Andrew Peters
Paul-Pierre Pastoret
Gregers Jungersen
Technical University of Denmark · DKMonash University · AUOrganisation Mondiale de la Santé Animale · FRUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The major goals of veterinary vaccines are to improve the health and welfare of companion animals, increase production of livestock in a cost-effective manner, and prevent animal-to-human transmission from both domestic animals and wildlife. These diverse aims have led to different approaches to the development of veterinary vaccines from crude but effective whole-pathogen preparations to molecularly defined subunit vaccines, genetically engineered organisms or chimeras, vectored antigen formulations, and naked DNA injections. The final successful outcome of vaccine research and development is the generation of a product that will be available in the marketplace or that will be used in the field to achieve desired outcomes. As detailed in this review, successful veterinary vaccines have been produced against viral, bacterial, protozoal, and multicellular pathogens, which in many ways have led the field in the application and adaptation of novel technologies. These veterinary vaccines have had, and continue to have, a major impact not only on animal health and production but also on human health through increasing safe food supplies and preventing animal-to-human transmission of infectious diseases. The continued interaction between animals and human researchers and health professionals will be of major importance for adapting new technologies, providing animal models of disease, and confronting new and emerging infectious diseases.

Indexed as

VaccinesAllergensAnimal DiseasesAnimalsAnimals, DomesticBacterial VaccinesCancer VaccinesCommunicable Disease ControlFertilityHypersensitivityNeoplasmsProtozoan VaccinesReproductionVaccinationVaccines, SubunitVaccines, SyntheticAllergensBacterial VaccinesCancer VaccinesProtozoan VaccinesVaccinesVaccines, SubunitVaccines, SyntheticViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID17630337
PMCPMC1932753
OpenAlexW2128953086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.