ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2007
[Pancreatic incidentalomas. Correct assessment and therapy].
Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whipple made simple for surgical pathologists: orientation, dissection, and sampling of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens for a more practical and accurate evaluation of pancreatic, distal common bile duct, and ampullary tumors.The American journal of surgical pathology · 2014Article
- [A rare tumor-like lesion of the pancreatic head with bile duct obstruction].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2011Article
- [Indications for surgical resection of benign pancreatic tumors].Der Radiologe · 2008Review
- [Importance of endoscopy and endosonography for chronic pancreatitis and benign pancreas tumors].Der Radiologe · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to recent advances in CT/MRI technology, incidentalomas of the pancreas are detected with increasing frequency. Pancreatic incidentalomas should be differentiated into solid and cystic tumors. In both subgroups definitive classification of the tumor is often not possible. Operative therapy is recommended in premalignant or malignant pathologies. Thus solid incidentalomas should be resected independently of their size, if the patient is without serious comorbidities. In case of cystic incidentalomas, benign cystic lesions should be excluded as far as possible. Otherwise they should be resected if their size is >or=2 cm. In case of IPMN with specific risk factors, resection is recommended when the tumor size exceeds 1 cm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17628760What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.