ReviewCNS drug reviews2007
Glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis: a review.
Review in CNS drug reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- MRI outcomes with cladribine tablets for multiple sclerosis in the CLARITY study.Journal of neurology · 2013Trial
- The Neurovascular Niche: A Gathering Venue for Neuroinflammation and Remyelination in Multiple Sclerosis.Acta physiologica (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
- Holding your nerve in academia whilst managing multiple sclerosis.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2024Article
- Unveiling the Potential of Cannabinoids in Multiple Sclerosis and the Dawn of Nano-Cannabinoid Medicine.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- The relevance of BDNF for neuroprotection and neuroplasticity in multiple sclerosis.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
- Review
- A review of possible therapies for multiple sclerosis.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2021Review
- Demonstration of Equivalence of Generic Glatiramer Acetate and CopaxoneFrontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Implications of COVID-19 Outbreak on Immune Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis Patients-Lessons Learned From SARS and MERS.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Article
- Cytokine Signaling in Multiple Sclerosis and Its Therapeutic Applications.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Review
- Process signatures in glatiramer acetate synthesis: structural and functional relationships.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- An update on immunopathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of multiple sclerosis.Brain and behavior · 2015Review
- Article
- Flare up reaction during provocation test to glatiramer acetate in a patient with allergy to interferon beta1a.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2014Article
- Requirement for safety monitoring for approved multiple sclerosis therapies: an overview.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2014Review
- Comparing the biological impact of glatiramer acetate with the biological impact of a generic.PloS one · 2014Article
- Glatiramer acetate treatment effects on gene expression in monocytes of multiple sclerosis patients.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2013Article
- IL-10 within the CNS is necessary for CD4+ T cells to mediate neuroprotection.Brain, behavior, and immunity · 2011Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is considered to be primarily an inflammatory autoimmune disease. Over the last 5 years, our view of the pathogenesis of MS has evolved considerably. The axonal damage was recognized as an early event in the disease process and as an important determinant of long-term disability. Therefore, the antiinflammatory and neuroprotective strategies are thought to represent promising approach to the therapy of MS. The therapeutic potential of glatiramer acetate (GA), a synthetic amino acid polymer composed of a mixture of L-glutamic acid, L-lysine, L-alanine, and L-tyrosine in defined proportions, in MS has been apparent for many years. GA has been shown to be effective in preventing and suppressing experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE), the animal model of MS. GA has been, therefore, evaluated in several clinical studies and found to alter the natural history of relapsing-remitting (RR)MS by reducing the relapse rate and affecting disability. These findings were confirmed in open-label follow-up trials covering more than 10 years of treatment. The trials demonstrated sustained efficacy for GA in slowing the progression of disability. The clinical therapeutic effect of GA is consistent with the results of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings from various clinical centers. At a daily standard dose of 20 mg, s.c., GA was generally well tolerated. The induction of GA-reactive T-helper 2-like regulatory suppressor cells is thought to be the main mechanism of the therapeutic action of this drug. In addition, it was recently shown that GA-reactive T cells produce neurotrophic factors (e.g., brain-derived neurotrophic factor [BDNF]) that protect neurons and axons in the area of injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.