ReviewArchives of disease in childhood2007
MMR: where are we now?
Review in Archives of disease in childhood, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vaccines and the social amplification of risk.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2022Article
- Vaccine Hesitancy: A Growing Concern.Paediatric drugs · 2020Article
- A Bayesian space-time model for clustering areal units based on their disease trends.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Relationship Between Media Coverage and Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) Vaccination Uptake in Denmark: Retrospective Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2019Article
- Anti-cancer vaccines - a one-hit wonder?The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2014Review
- Article
- Article
- Measles mimicking HIV seroconversion syndrome: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2010Article
- A translational framework for public health research.BMC public health · 2009Article
- Current awareness: pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2008Article
- Improving uptake of MMR vaccine.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.