Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17625256›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews2006

The gastrointestinal tract stem cell niche.

Tzung-Hai Yen, Nicholas A Wright

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 132 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
132citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

132 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A simple, efficient technique to make colon crypt gels for 3D models.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Adult Bovine-Derived Small and Large Intestinal Organoids:Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Cross-Talk Between the Intestinal Epithelium andFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  15. Moving Up a NOTCH: Defining the Stem Cell Niche in the Gastric Antrum.Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. A roadmap for intestinal regeneration.The International journal of developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

72 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tzung-Hai YenHistopathology Unit, Cancer Research UK, London Research Institute, London, UK. m19570@adm.cgmh.org.tw
Nicholas A Wright

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gastrointestinal epithelium is unique in that cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis occur in an orderly fashion along the crypt-villus axis. The intestinal crypt is mainly a proliferative compartment, is monoclonal and is maintained by stem cells. The villus represents the differentiated compartment, and is polyclonal as it receives cells from multiple crypts. In the small intestine, cell migration begins near the base of the crypt, and cells migrate from here emerging onto the villi. The basal crypt cells at position 5 are candidate stem cells. As the function of stem cells is to maintain the integrity of the intestinal epithelium, it must self-renew, proliferate, and differentiate within a protective niche. This niche is made up of proliferating and differentiating epithelial cells and surrounding mesenchymal cells. These mesenchymal cells promote the epithelial- mesenchymal crosstalk required to maintain the niche. A stochastic model of cell division has been proposed to explain how a single common ancestral stem cell exists from which all stem cells in a niche are descended. Our group has argued that these crypts then clonally expand by crypt fission, forming two daughters' crypts, and that this is the mechanism by which mutated stem cells or even cancer stem cell clones expand in the colon and in the entire gastrointestinal tract. Until recently, the differentiation potential of stem cells into adult tissues has been thought to be limited to cell lineages in the organ from which they were derived. Bone marrow cells are rare among adult stem cells regarding their abundance and role in the continuous, lifelong, physiological replenishment of circulating cells. In human and mice experiments, we have shown that bone marrow can contribute to the regeneration of intestinal myofibroblasts and thereby after epithelium following damage, through replacing the cells, which maintain the stem cells niche. Little is known about the markers characterizing the stem and transit amplifying populations of the gastrointestinal tract, although musashi-1 and hairy and enhancer of split homolog-1 have been proposed. As the mammalian gastrointestinal tract develops from the embryonic gut, it is made up of an endodermally-derived epithelium surrounded by cells of mesoderm origin. Cell signaling between these two tissue layers plays a critical role in coordinating patterning and organogenesis of the gut and its derivatives. Many lines of evidence have revealed that Wnt signaling is the most dominant force in controlling cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis along the crypt-villus axis. We have found Wnt messenger RNAs expression in intestinal subepithelial myofibroblasts and frizzled messenger RNAs expression in both myofibroblasts and crypt epithelium. Moreover, there are many other factors, for example, bone morphogenetic protein, homeobox, forkhead, hedgehog, homeodomain, and platelet-derived growth factor that are also important to stem cell signaling in the gastrointestinal tract.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersCell DivisionCell LineageGastrointestinal TractHumansSignal TransductionStem CellsBiomarkers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.