Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17624558›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2007

Presenting the alternative: cancer and complementary and alternative medicine in the Canadian print media.

Laura Weeks, Marja Verhoef, Catherine Scott

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Trick or treat? Australian newspaper portrayal of complementary and alternative medicine for the treatment of cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2011
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Comprehensive analysis of cancer coverage in important Chinese newspapers between 2000 and 2007.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2009
    Article
  6. Article
  7. How the public is being misled about complementary/alternative medicine.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2008
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura WeeksDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. lvanderh@ucalgary.ca
Marja Verhoef
Catherine Scott
University of Calgary · CAAlberta Health Services · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

goals of workCancer patients repeatedly identify the mass media as a primary information source to support their decisions to use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Accordingly, the objectives of this research are to describe: (1) what has been reported in the Canadian print media regarding CAM treatment for cancer between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 2005; (2) how that information was represented; and (3) trends in reporting frequency and reporting characteristics. MATERIALS AND

methodsContent analysis of all articles published in four Canadian newspapers and five magazines that discussed CAM treatment for cancer. MAIN

results915 articles were identified: 760 newspaper articles and 155 magazine articles. The CAM therapies most commonly described in media reports were: natural health products, CAM therapies in general, special diets, spirituality, and meditation. CAM therapies were most often described in a positive fashion, and CAM use was most often described as a potential cure for cancer. The majority of articles did not present information on the risks, benefits, and costs of CAM use and few provided a recommendation to speak with a health care provider before use.

conclusionsThe results correspond with the commercial interests of media outlets, as coverage appears to be focused around entertainment rather than information provision. The media play a role in introducing a range of treatment options to cancer patients that may not be discussed by conventional health care providers; however, the information provided in media articles appears insufficient to assist patients with informed decision-making.

Indexed as

Complementary TherapiesMass MediaBibliometricsCanadaNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID17624558
OpenAlexW1999216221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.